Between past and future ruins: Post-Ottoman Niš in the album of Knez Milan Obrenović

While historians of Southeast Europe have recently increasingly turned to photographs as primary sources, this article reads a late 19th century photographic album not as an (objective) representation of a city, but as a carefully constructed visual narrative with afterlives of its own. The album, created upon the annexation of the city of Niš from the Ottoman Empire, produces multiple temporalities: the “recurring” and “timeless” national authenticity of the village, shown through costumes and church ruins, is contrasted with the images of the city, which the album constitutes as “old” and photographs as “future ruins.” The latter serves to establish a temporal break between the Ottoman past and the pending Serbian modernization project. Today, the album embodies two distinct afterlives. First, the Ottoman city—and the Empire itself—which the album proclaims “dead,” continues to live only as an object of photography. Second, the album today represents an afterlife of the foundational ideologies and images of post-Ottoman nation-making in and beyond Serbia. The two afterlives are not without contradiction: even though it is used to proclaim the empire “dead,” the album represents an ambivalent material afterlife of the empire in the present (Walton, 2019), while the ambivalence of photography as a medium itself opens avenues for readings beyond the prescribed.

[1]  R. Hardy Imaging and imagining Palestine: photography, modernity and the biblical lens, 1918–1948 , 2022, International Affairs.

[2]  S. Zananiri Imaging and Imagining Palestine: An Introduction , 2021, Imaging and Imagining Palestine.

[3]  Issam Nassar Bearers of Memory: Photo Albums as Sources of Historical Study in Palestine , 2021, Imaging and Imagining Palestine.

[4]  Nadi Abusaada Urban Encounters: Imaging the City in Mandate Palestine , 2021, Imaging and Imagining Palestine.

[5]  E. Manikowska Photography and Cultural Heritage in the Age of Nationalisms , 2020 .

[6]  N. Mišković Why Are We So Similar? Post-Ottoman Urban Space in Turkey and Yugoslavia , 2020, Sharpening the Haze: Visual Essays on Imperial History and Memory.

[7]  Jeremy F. Walton Introduction: Textured historicity and the ambivalence of imperial legacies , 2019, History and Anthropology.

[8]  W. Benjamin The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction , 2018, A Museum Studies Approach to Heritage.

[9]  F. Riedler Communal Boundaries and Confessional Policies in Ottoman Niš , 2018 .

[10]  T. Edensor,et al.  Patina: A Profane Archaeology , 2016, The AAG Review of Books.

[11]  P. T. Craddock,et al.  Patina , 2016, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[12]  C. Caraffa,et al.  Photo Archives and the Idea of Nation , 2014 .

[13]  A. Hamber Architecture in Nineteenth-Century Photographs: Essays on Reading a Collection , 2013 .

[14]  Z. Çelik Framing the colony: houses of Algeria photographed , 2004 .

[15]  D. Poole Raw Histories: Photographs, Anthropology and Museums , 2004 .

[16]  John Zarobell Jean-Charles Langlois's Panorama of Algiers (1833) and the Prospective Colonial Landscape , 2003 .

[17]  Sergio Paulo Benevides,et al.  Silencing the past: power and the production of history , 1999 .

[18]  H. Pritchard,et al.  The History of Photography , 1872, Nature.

[19]  A. Ignjatović Byzantium Evolutionized: Architectural History and National Identity in Turn-of-the-Century Serbia , 2014 .

[20]  M. Baleva The Empire Strikes Back. Image Battles and Image Frontlines during the Russo–Turkish War of 1877–1878 , 2013 .

[21]  A. Ersoy A SARTORIAL TRIBUTE TO LATE TANZIMAT OTTOMANISM: THE ELBİSE-İ ‘OSMĀNIYYE ALBUM , 2003 .

[22]  Gary D. Sampson,et al.  Colonialist photography : imag(in)ing race and place , 2002 .