Precise orbit determination for quad-constellation satellites at Wuhan University: strategy, result validation, and comparison

This contribution summarizes the strategy used by Wuhan University (WHU) to determine precise orbit and clock products for Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS). In particular, the satellite attitude, phase center corrections, solar radiation pressure model developed and used for BDS satellites are addressed. In addition, this contribution analyzes the orbit and clock quality of the quad-constellation products from MGEX Analysis Centers (ACs) for a common time period of 1 year (2014). With IGS final GPS and GLONASS products as the reference, Multi-GNSS products of WHU (indicated by WUM) show the best agreement among these products from all MGEX ACs in both accuracy and stability. 3D Day Boundary Discontinuities (DBDs) range from 8 to 27 cm for Galileo-IOV satellites among all ACs’ products, whereas WUM ones are the largest (about 26.2 cm). Among three types of BDS satellites, MEOs show the smallest DBDs from 10 to 27 cm, whereas the DBDs for all ACs products are at decimeter to meter level for GEOs and one to three decimeter for IGSOs, respectively. As to the satellite laser ranging (SLR) validation for Galileo-IOV satellites, the accuracy evaluated by SLR residuals is at the one decimeter level with the well-known systematic bias of about $$-5$$-5 cm for all ACs. For BDS satellites, the accuracy could reach decimeter level, one decimeter level, and centimeter level for GEOs, IGSOs, and MEOs, respectively. However, there is a noticeable bias in GEO SLR residuals. In addition, systematic errors dependent on orbit angle related to mismodeled solar radiation pressure (SRP) are present for BDS GEOs and IGSOs. The results of Multi-GNSS combined kinematic PPP demonstrate that the best accuracy of position and fastest convergence speed have been achieved using WUM products, particularly in the Up direction. Furthermore, the accuracy of static BDS only PPP degrades when the BDS IGSO and MEO satellites switches to orbit-normal orientation, particularly for COM products, whereas the WUM show the slightest degradation.

[1]  H. Laborit,et al.  [Experimental study]. , 1958, Bulletin mensuel - Societe de medecine militaire francaise.

[2]  W. I. Bertiger,et al.  Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase , 1992 .

[3]  L. Mervart,et al.  Extended orbit modeling techniques at the CODE processing center of the international GPS service for geodynamics (IGS): theory and initial results. , 1994 .

[4]  Yoaz E. Bar-Sever,et al.  A new model for GPS yaw attitude , 1996 .

[5]  Michael R Pearlman,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL LASER RANGING SERVICE , 2007 .

[6]  Li Zhenghang PRECISE POINT POSITIONING , 2002 .

[7]  J. Dow,et al.  PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION , 2004 .

[8]  Horst-Dieter Fischer,et al.  ATTITUDE & ORBIT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR GALILEO IOV* , 2007 .

[9]  Chris Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service (IGS): Preparations for the Coming Decade , 2007 .

[10]  Liu Jing-nan,et al.  PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination , 2003, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.

[11]  Jan Kouba,et al.  A simplified yaw-attitude model for eclipsing GPS satellites , 2009 .

[12]  Jim R. Ray,et al.  On the precision and accuracy of IGS orbits , 2009 .

[13]  Chris Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2009 .

[14]  Florian Dilssner,et al.  The GLONASS-M satellite yaw-attitude model , 2011 .

[15]  P. Steigenberger,et al.  Adjustable box-wing model for solar radiation pressure impacting GPS satellites , 2012 .

[16]  Chuang Shi,et al.  Precise orbit determination of Beidou Satellites with precise positioning , 2012, Science China Earth Sciences.

[17]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Initial results of precise orbit and clock determination for COMPASS navigation satellite system , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[18]  Harald Schuh,et al.  Experimental Study on the Precise Orbit Determination of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System , 2013, Sensors.

[19]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  IGS-MGEX: Preparing the Ground for Multi-Constellation GNSS Science , 2013 .

[20]  Rodríguez Solano,et al.  Impact of non-conservative force modeling on GNSS satellite orbits and global solutions , 2014 .

[21]  Maik Uhlemann,et al.  Precise orbit determination of Beidou Satellites at GFZ , 2014 .

[22]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Enhanced solar radiation pressure modeling for Galileo satellites , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[23]  C. Shi,et al.  Precise orbit determination of BeiDou constellation based on BETS and MGEX network , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Adrian Jäggi,et al.  The CODE solution for the IGS MGEX , 2014 .

[25]  Xiaotao Li,et al.  Precise Point Positioning with the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System , 2014, Sensors.

[26]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Galileo orbit determination using combined GNSS and SLR observations , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[27]  Baocheng Zhang,et al.  Monitoring the ionosphere based on the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China , 2015 .

[28]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Galileo Orbit and Clock Quality of the IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment , 2015 .

[29]  Maik Uhlemann,et al.  GFZ Global Multi-GNSS Network and Data Processing Results , 2015 .