A COMPARISON OF REVEALED PREFERENCE AND STATED PREFERENCE MODELS OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR

Contributes to the issue of the validity of using stated preference experiments by comparing the values of time derived from revealed preference and stated preference models of travel behavior. A particular feature of the analysis is the comparison of values of time which stratified by a number of relevant socioeconomic factors. This allows a more detailed assessment of the stated preference responses than is possible by just comparing the overall values derived. The results suggest that stated preferences provide an accurate guide to individuals actual preferences.

[1]  Pradeep K. Korgaonkar,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Self-Explicated, Huber-Hybrid, Traditional Conjoint, and Hybrid Conjoint Models , 1983 .

[2]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[3]  W. Hyman,et al.  WISCONSIN WORK MODE-CHOICE MODELS BASED ON FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT AND DISAGGREGATE BEHAVIORAL DATA , 1982 .

[4]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Predictive Validity of Trade-Off Analysis for Alternative Segmentation Schemes , 1979 .

[5]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  LABORATORY-SIMULATION VERSUS REVEALED-PREFERENCE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1981 .

[6]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[7]  J J Bates,et al.  VALUE OF TIME RESEARCH: SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY AND RECOMMENDATIONS --TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METHODS. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR M HELD AT THE PTRC SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, SUSSEX UNIVERSITY, ENGLAND, JULY 14-17, 1986. VOLUME P282 , 1986 .

[8]  J J Bates.  VALUES OF TIME FROM STATED PREFERENCE DATA , 1984 .

[9]  Mark Wardman.  Route choice and the value of motorists' travel time: empirical findings , 1986 .

[10]  Roger J. Best,et al.  Conjoint Measurement: Temporal Stability and Structural Reliability , 1979 .

[11]  T Fowkes,et al.  COPING WITH ERRORS AND BIASES IN DATA COLLECTION: ISSUES IN THE ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL SURVEYS --TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METHODS. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR C HELD AT THE PTRC SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, BATH UNIVERSITY ENGLAND, 7-11 SEPTEMBER 1987, VOLUME P290 , 1987 .

[12]  M Roberts,et al.  RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH MODELS FITTED TO STATED PREFERENCE DATA , 1983 .

[13]  Peter Bonsall.  TRANSFER PRICE DATA - ITS USE AND ABUSE , 1983 .

[14]  Arun Chatterjee,et al.  Non-commitment bias in public opinion on transit usage , 1983 .

[15]  Ian Graeme Heggie,et al.  Modal choice and the value of travel time , 1976 .

[16]  Michael R Couture,et al.  ANALYZING TRAVELER ATTITUDES TO RESOLVE INTENDED AND ACTUAL USE OF A NEW TRANSIT SERVICE , 1981 .

[17]  H Gunn,et al.  ESTIMATING VALUES OF TIME: AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF TRANSFER PRICE METHODS WITH THE REVEALED PREFERENCE APPROACH , 1983 .

[18]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  USING FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT TO IDENTIFY THE FORM OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS IN TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1978 .

[19]  M Wardman,et al.  A SUMMARY OF FOUR STUDIES INTO THE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS --TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METHODS. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR M HELD AT THE PTRC SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, SUSSEX UNIVERSITY, ENGLAND, JULY 14-17, 1986. VOLUME P282 , 1986 .

[20]  Lalita Sen,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF FOUR MULTIATTRIBUTE APPROACHES TO ATTITUDINAL MEASUREMENT , 1982 .

[21]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[22]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  THE MAGNITUDE OF INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL VARIATIONS IN DEMAND COEFFICIENTS: A XENIA, OHIO CASE EXAMPLE , 1983 .

[23]  John O. Summers,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Conjoint Analysis and Self-Explicated Weights: A Comparison , 1984 .

[24]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Structural Reliability and Stability of Nonmetric Conjoint Analysis , 1982 .