Beneath the ‘Digital Native’ myth

As young people’s internet use shapes their experiences of education, work and personal relationships, their portrayal as ‘Digital Natives’ suggests that they are invariably better positioned than preceding generations to capitalize on such changes. Recent debates in internet use research undermine this view. While acknowledging socio-demographic differences in use, theorists disagree as to whether these reflect disparities in internet access, processes of social stratification, or users’ rational assessment of risks and opportunities. Incorporating these views, this article develops a framework for investigating differences in academic and social internet use by using data from 6444 high school students in Queensland, Australia. The results show that different factors structure students’ entry into these use pathways. Since social use depends on one’s home access context, remote students with poorer access spent less time on this activity, whereas students at independent and Catholic schools were heavier academic users, because they possessed the requisite academic orientation.

[1]  R. J. Repique Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[2]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[4]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[5]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[6]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage , 2009 .

[7]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[8]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[9]  Tanya Notley,et al.  Young People, Online Networks, and Social Inclusion , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  J. Palfrey,et al.  Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives , 2009, Choice Reviews Online.

[11]  Lisa J. Servon Bridging the Digital Divide , 2002 .

[12]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[13]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[14]  M. Green,et al.  Digital natives , 2012, BDJ.

[15]  Lisa J. Servon Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community, and Public Policy , 2002 .

[16]  Veronika Kalmus,et al.  Opportunities and benefits online , 2009 .

[17]  D. McQuail McQuail's Mass Communication Theory , 2000 .

[18]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[19]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[20]  E. Hargittai Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[21]  H. Ono,et al.  Gender and the Internet , 2003 .

[22]  Ioana Boghian Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste , 2013 .

[23]  J. Elster Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences , 2007 .

[24]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  David Buckingham,et al.  Introducing Identity , 2007 .

[26]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market? , 1997 .

[27]  Douglas Raber,et al.  The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth , 2002 .

[28]  E. Hargittai The Digital Reproduction of Inequality , 2008 .

[29]  S Balquiedra Marianna First Year Students , 2014 .

[30]  Sara Hassani Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else , 2006 .