Comparison of data-driven TakagiSugeno models of rainfalldischarge dynamics

Over the last decades, several data-driven techniques have been applied to model the rainfall-discharge dynamics of catchments. Among these techniques are fuzzy rule-based models, which attempt to describe the catchment response to rainfall input through fuzzy relationships. In this paper, we demonstrate three different methods for constructing fuzzy rule-based models of the Takagi-Sugeno type relating rainfall to catchment discharge. They correspond to the grid partitioning, subtractive clustering, and Gustafson-Kessel (GK) clustering identification methods. The data set used to parametrize and validate the models consists of hourly precipitation and discharge records. The models are parametrized using a 1-year identification data set and are then applied to a 4-year data set. Although the models show a similar performance, the best results are obtained for the GK method. A real-time flood forecasting algorithm is then developed, in which discharge measurements are assimilated into the model at either an hourly or a daily time step. The results suggest that the GK method can potentially be used as an operational flood forecasting tool with a low computational cost.

[1]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[2]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[3]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(c) Red–Arkansas River basin experiment:: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons , 1998 .

[4]  Yen-Chang Chen,et al.  A counterpropagation fuzzy-neural network modeling approach to real time streamflow prediction , 2001 .

[5]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  A metahillslope model based on an analytical solution to a linearized Boussinesq equation for temporally variable recharge rates , 2002 .

[6]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response , 1979 .

[7]  X. R. Liu,et al.  The Xinanjiang model. , 1995 .

[8]  Klaus-Peter Holz,et al.  Rainfall-runoff modelling using adaptive neuro-fuzzy systems , 2001 .

[9]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[10]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Computer-Controlled Systems: Theory and Design , 1984 .

[11]  Robert Babuska,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling for Control , 1998 .

[12]  O. J. Dunn Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums , 1964 .

[13]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  A hybrid multi-model approach to river level forecasting , 2000 .

[14]  J. Nash A unit hydrograph study, with particular reference to British catchments [Discussion] , 1960 .

[15]  L. K. Sherman Streamflow from rainfall by the unit-graph method , 1932 .

[16]  Asaad Y. Shamseldin,et al.  A non-linear combination of the forecasts of rainfall-runoff models by the first-order Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system , 2001 .

[17]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[18]  I. Bogardi,et al.  Application of fuzzy rule-based modeling technique to regional drought , 1999 .

[19]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[20]  Karsten Schulz,et al.  Water flow modeling in the unsaturated zone with imprecise parameters using a fuzzy approach , 1997 .

[21]  Dimitri P. Solomatine,et al.  Application of adaptive fuzzy rule-based models for reconstruction of missing precipitation events , 2000 .

[22]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[23]  Donald Gustafson,et al.  Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix , 1978, 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[24]  V. Singh,et al.  The HBV model. , 1995 .

[25]  Axel Bronstert,et al.  1-, 2- and 3-dimensional modeling of water movement in the unsaturated soil matrix using a fuzzy approach , 1995 .

[26]  Uzay Kaymak,et al.  Improved covariance estimation for Gustafson-Kessel clustering , 2002, 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ-IEEE'02. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37291).

[27]  J. C. Peters,et al.  Fuzzy cluster analysis--a new method to predict future cardiac events in patients with positive stress tests. , 1998, Japanese circulation journal.

[28]  R. Moore The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales , 1985 .

[29]  Geza Pesti,et al.  A fuzzy rule-based approach to drought assessment , 1996 .

[30]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Development of a fuzzy logic-based rainfall-runoff model , 2001 .

[31]  Wayne Woldt,et al.  Fuzzy rule-based approach to describe solute transport in the unsaturated zone , 1999 .

[32]  Markus Disse,et al.  Fuzzy rule-based models for infiltration , 1993 .

[33]  Stephen L. Chiu,et al.  Fuzzy Model Identification Based on Cluster Estimation , 1994, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[34]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Fuzzy conceptual rainfall–runoff models , 2001 .