Coupling conditionally independent submaps for large-scale 2.5D mapping with Gaussian Markov Random Fields

Building large-scale 2.5D maps when spatial correlations are considered can be quite expensive, but there are clear advantages when fusing data. While optimal submapping strategies have been explored previously in covariance-form using Gaussian Process for large-scale mapping, this paper focuses on transferring such concepts into information form. By exploiting the conditional independence property of the Gaussian Markov Random Field (GMRF) models, we propose a submapping approach to build a nearly optimal global 2.5D map. In the proposed approach data is fused by first fitting a GMRF to one sensor dataset; then conditional independent submaps are inferred using this model and updated individually with new data arrives. Finally, the information is propagated from submap to submap to later recover the fully updated map. This is efficiently achieved by exploiting the inherent structure of the GMRF, fusion and propagation all in information form. The key contribution of this paper is the derivation of the algorithm to optimally propagate information through submaps by only updating the common parts between submaps. Our results show the proposed method reduces the computational complexity of the full mapping process while maintaining the accuracy. The performance is evaluated on synthetic data from the Canadian Digital Elevation Data.

[1]  G. Golub,et al.  Large scale geodetic least squares adjustment by dissection and orthogonal decomposition , 1979 .

[2]  Matthew R. Walter,et al.  Exactly Sparse Extended Information Filters for Feature-based SLAM , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .

[4]  H. Rue,et al.  An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach , 2011 .

[5]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Gaussian Process Random Fields , 2015, NIPS.

[6]  Bayesian fusion using conditionally independent submaps for high resolution 2.5D mapping , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[7]  Liye Sun,et al.  Gaussian Markov Random Fields for fusion in information form , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[8]  E. Cuthill,et al.  Reducing the bandwidth of sparse symmetric matrices , 1969, ACM '69.

[9]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  An Efficient Extension to Elevation Maps for Outdoor Terrain Mapping and Loop Closing , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[11]  Alonzo Kelly,et al.  Rough Terrain Autonomous Mobility—Part 2: An Active Vision, Predictive Control Approach , 1998, Auton. Robots.

[12]  Leonhard Held,et al.  Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[13]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Heteroscedastic Gaussian processes for data fusion in large scale terrain modeling , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  A. George Nested Dissection of a Regular Finite Element Mesh , 1973 .

[15]  Juan D. Tardós,et al.  Large-Scale SLAM Building Conditionally Independent Local Maps: Application to Monocular Vision , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Gaussian Process modeling of large scale terrain , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Teresa A. Vidal-Calleja,et al.  Learning spatial correlations for Bayesian fusion in pipe thickness mapping , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[18]  Volker Tresp,et al.  A Bayesian Committee Machine , 2000, Neural Computation.

[19]  Jonghyuk Kim,et al.  Continuous occupancy maps using overlapping local Gaussian processes , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Marcos P. Gerardo-Castro,et al.  Non-parametric consistency test for multiple-sensing-modality data fusion , 2015, 2015 18th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion).

[22]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Correctness of Belief Propagation in Gaussian Graphical Models of Arbitrary Topology , 1999, Neural Computation.