SEISMIC PROTECTION OF HEAVY NON-STRUCTURAL MONOLITHIC OBJECTS AT THE TOP OF A HISTORICAL MASONRY CONSTRUCTION THROUGH BASE ISOLATION

This contribution addresses the problem of earthquake protection of heavy nonstructural monolithic objects, which are usually placed at the top of historical masonry constructions for mainly decorative purposes like pinnacles, merlons, sculptures and heavy artwork. Such objects, when subjected to base accelerations due to seismic actions, may undergo rocking phenomena, which may eventually lead to the overturning of the whole body. In particular, the specific case of the seismic protection of ancient marble pinnacles placed at the top of a three-arched masonry city gate in Ferrara (ITALY) is illustrated. In a preliminary rocking analysis, the pinnacles have been idealized as rigid bodies in unilateral contact with the underlying moving base and the resulting rocking motion have been analyzed. The structural safety level of the pinnacles have thus been assessed. As a consequence of these considerations, a base isolation system designed around multiple double concave curved-surface steel sliders have been devised. The effectiveness of the proposed isolation system has been assessed through numerical simulations. The amplification effect of the ground acceleration due to the underlying three-arched structure has been established through time-history dynamic analyses, where masonry has been considered as a viscoelastic material. To this aim, an equivalent viscous damping coefficient has been calculated for masonry following an iterative procedure involving the computation of capacity curves for both inand out-of-plane load directions and the definition of simplified biand tri-linear inelastic load-displacement capacity curves for masonry panels.

[1]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber , 1993 .

[2]  George W. Housner Earthquake Protection of Essential Building Equipment , 1983 .

[3]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Analysis of the rocking response of rigid blocks standing free on a seismically isolated base , 2012 .

[4]  J. Penzien,et al.  Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes , 1980 .

[5]  G. Housner The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes , 1963 .

[6]  Fabrizio Antonelli,et al.  Assessment of seismic vulnerability of art objects: The “Galleria dei Prigioni” sculptures at the Accademia Gallery in Florence , 2012 .

[7]  Luca Nicolini Equivalent Viscous Damping and Inelastic Displacement for Strengthened and Reinforced Masonry Walls , 2012 .

[8]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Numerical models for the seismic assessment of an old masonry tower , 2010 .

[9]  Luisa Berto,et al.  Seismic risk mitigation technique for art objects: experimental evaluation and numerical modelling of double concave curved surface sliders , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[10]  Alessandro Contento,et al.  Seismic response of a non-symmetric rigid block on a constrained oscillating base , 2010 .

[11]  Alessandro Contento,et al.  Base isolation of slide-rocking non-symmetric rigid blocks under impulsive and seismic excitations , 2009 .

[12]  Li Yanheng,et al.  Response of 3D Free Axisymmetric Rigid Objects under Seismic Excitations , 2008 .

[13]  I. Vardoulakis,et al.  Dynamic motion of a conical frustum over a rough horizontal plane , 2011 .

[14]  V. Gioncu,et al.  Earthquake Engineering for Structural Design , 2010 .

[15]  Aik‐Siong Koh,et al.  Free Rocking of Cylindrical Structures , 1990 .

[16]  Angelo Di Egidio,et al.  Seismic Protection of Monolithic Objects of Art Using a Constrained Oscillating Base , 2012 .

[17]  F. Vestroni,et al.  BASE ISOLATION FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION OF STATUES , 1999 .

[18]  Panayiotis C. Roussis,et al.  BASE-ISOLATION TECHNOLOGY FOR EARTHQUAKE PROTECTION OF ART OBJECTS , 2008 .

[19]  Ivo Caliò,et al.  Passive control of the seismic rocking response of art objects , 2003 .