Analysis and flamelet modelling for spray combustion

The validity of a steady-flamelet model and a flamelet/progress-variable approach for gaseous and spray combustion is investigated by a two-dimensional direct numerical simulation (DNS) of gaseous and spray jet flames, and the combustion characteristics are analysed. A modified flamelet/progress-variable approach, in which total enthalpy rather than product mass fraction is chosen as a progress variable, is also examined. DNS with an Arrhenius formation, in which the chemical reaction is directly solved in the physical flow field, is performed as a reference to validate the combustion models. The results show that the diffusion flame is dominant in the gaseous diffusion jet flame, whereas diffusion and premixed flames coexist in the spray jet flame. The characteristics of the spray flame change from premixed–diffusion coexistent to diffusion-dominant downstream. Comparisons among the results from DNS with various combustion models show the modified flamelet/progress-variable approach to be superior to the other combustion models, particularly for the spray flame. Where the behaviour of the gaseous total enthalpy is strongly affected by the energy transfer (i.e. heat transfer and mass transfer) from the dispersed droplet, and this effect can be accounted for only by solving the conservation equation of the total enthalpy. However, even the DNS with the modified flamelet/progress-variable approach tends to underestimate the gaseous temperature in the central region of the spray jet flame. To increase the prediction accuracy, a combustion model for the partially premixed flame for the spray flame is necessary.

[1]  R. Kurose,et al.  Characteristics of flamelets in spray flames formed in a laminar counterflow , 2007 .

[2]  R. Kurose,et al.  Combustion mechanism of liquid fuel spray in a gaseous flame , 2005 .

[3]  L. Vervisch,et al.  Analysis of weakly turbulent dilute-spray flames and spray combustion regimes , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Luc Vervisch,et al.  DNS analysis of partially premixed combustion in spray and gaseous turbulent flame-bases stabilized in hot air , 2005 .

[5]  P. Moin,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Hisao Makino,et al.  Large eddy simulation of a solid-fuel jet flame , 2003 .

[7]  R. Kurose,et al.  Effects of outflow from the surface of a sphere on drag, shear lift, and scalar diffusion , 2003 .

[8]  K. Bray,et al.  Partially premixed flamelets in LES of nonpremixed turbulent combustion , 2002 .

[9]  P. Moin,et al.  LES of atomizing spray with stochastic modeling of secondary breakup , 2002 .

[10]  H. Pitsch Unsteady Flamelet Modeling of Differential Diffusion in Turbulent Jet Diffusion Flames , 2000 .

[11]  H. Pitsch,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent piloted methane/air diffusion flame (Sandia flame D) , 2000 .

[12]  Franck Nicoud,et al.  Conservative High-Order Finite-Difference Schemes for Low-Mach Number Flows , 2000 .

[13]  J. Bellan,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of a confined three-dimensional gas mixing layer with one evaporating hydrocarbon-droplet-laden stream , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Ryoichi Kurose,et al.  Drag and lift forces on a rotating sphere in a linear shear flow , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Josette Bellan,et al.  Evaluation of equilibrium and non-equilibrium evaporation models for many-droplet gas-liquid flow simulations , 1998 .

[16]  N. Peters,et al.  A Consistent Flamelet Formulation for Non-Premixed Combustion Considering Differential Diffusion Effects , 1998 .

[17]  P. Moin,et al.  Fully Conservative Higher Order Finite Difference Schemes for Incompressible Flow , 1998 .

[18]  Eva Gutheil,et al.  Diffusion Flames Based on a Laminar Spray Flame Library , 1998 .

[19]  M. Rogers,et al.  A priori testing of subgrid models for chemically reacting non-premixed turbulent shear flows , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Andrew W. Cook,et al.  A laminar flamelet approach to subgrid-scale chemistry in turbulent flows , 1997 .

[21]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation , 1990 .

[22]  William A. Sirignano,et al.  Droplet vaporization model for spray combustion calculations , 1988 .

[23]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  A FORTRAN COMPUTER CODE PACKAGE FOR THE EVALUATION OF GAS-PHASE, MULTICOMPONENT TRANSPORT PROPERTIES , 1986 .

[24]  P. Moin,et al.  Application of a Fractional-Step Method to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1984 .

[25]  H. Chiu,et al.  Group Combustion of Liquid Droplets , 1977 .

[26]  R. Kurose,et al.  Effects of radiation on spray flame characteristics and soot formation , 2008 .

[27]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Unstructured LES of Reacting Multiphase Flows in Realistic Gas Turbine Combustors , 2003 .

[28]  H. Pitsch,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion using a level-set approach , 2002 .

[29]  C. Pierce,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion , 2001 .

[30]  T. Takeno,et al.  A numerical study on flame stability at the transition point of jet diffusion flames , 1996 .

[31]  R. J. Kee,et al.  Chemkin-II : A Fortran Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas Phase Chemical Kinetics , 1991 .

[32]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[33]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Chemical kinetic modeling of hydrocarbon combustion , 1984 .

[34]  H. Chiu,et al.  Internal group combustion of liquid droplets , 1982 .

[35]  Martin Summerfield,et al.  Theoretical examination of assumptions commonly used for the gas phase surrounding a burning droplet , 1978 .