THE PROCESS OF CRIMINALIZATION: THE CASE OF COMPUTER CRIME LAWS*

Scholars are rarely afforded contemporary opportunities to study the formation of criminal law. This paper reviews state and federal efforts to criminalize various forms of computer abuse. The analysis indicates that there was neither organized opposition to nor significant interest group involvement in computer crime enactments. Individual reformers included computer crime “experts” and legislators rather than “moral entrepreneurs.” The media were crucial to the criminalization, in that they provided both data on the incidence of computer crime and also helped to define society's response to the perceived problem. The paper concludes that the criminalization of computer abuse can be interpreted as a symbolic endeavor to educate and socialize a new generation of computer users by extending traditional definitions of property and privacy.

[1]  A. Gillis,et al.  Class in the Household: A Power-Control Theory of Gender and Delinquency , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Erdwin H. Pfuhl.  Computer abuse: Problems of instrumental control , 1987 .

[3]  N. ben-yehuda,et al.  THE SOCIOLOGY OF MORAL PANICS: TOWARD A NEW SYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[4]  J. Adler.  Vagging the Demons and Scoundrels , 1986 .

[5]  Craig V. D. Thornton,et al.  Crime, Deterrence, and Rational Choice , 1986 .

[6]  John Hagan,et al.  White-Collar Crime and Punishment: The Class Structure and Legal Sanctioning of Securities Violations , 1985 .

[7]  R. Berk,et al.  Varieties of Normative Consensus , 1985 .

[8]  J. Best,et al.  The Razor Blade in the Apple: The Social Construction of Urban Legends , 1985 .

[9]  A. Gillis,et al.  The Class Structure of Gender and Delinquency: Toward a Power-Control Theory of Common Delinquent Behavior , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  John T. Soma,et al.  LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARD ACTIVITIES , 1985 .

[11]  J. BloomBecker.  COMPUTER CRIME UPDATE: THE VIEW AS WE EXIT 1984 , 1985 .

[12]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter? , 1983 .

[13]  M. Zald,et al.  From Pressure Group to Social Movement: Organizational Dilemmas of the Effort to Promote Nuclear Power , 1982 .

[14]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Norm Qualities and Adolescent Drinking and Drug Behavior: The Effects of Norm Quality and Reference Group on Using and Abusing Alcohol and Marijuana , 1982 .

[15]  K. Tierney.  THE BATTERED WOMEN MOVEMENT AND THE CREATION OF THE WIFE BEATING PROBLEM , 1982 .

[16]  R. McCleary,et al.  Deterrence of Drinking and Driving in France - An Evaluation of the Law of July 12, 1978 , 1981 .

[17]  John Hagan,et al.  The Legislation of Crime and Delinquency: A Review of Theory, Method, and Research , 1980 .

[18]  R. A. Farrell,et al.  Corporate Homicide: Definitional Processes in the Creation of Deviance , 1980 .

[19]  R. Meier,et al.  Constructing a Social Problem: The Press and the Environment , 1979 .

[20]  M. Fishman,et al.  Crime Waves as Ideology , 1978 .

[21]  S. Pfohl.  The “Discovery” of Child Abuse , 1977 .

[22]  J. Andenaes.  The Moral or Educative Influence of Criminal Law , 1971 .

[23]  P. Roby.  Politics and Criminal Law: Revision of the New York State Penal Law on Prostitution , 1969 .

[24]  Donald T. Dickson.  Bureaucracy and Morality: An Organizational Perspective on a Moral Crusade , 1968 .

[25]  Ronald L. Akers,et al.  The Professional Association and the Legal Regulation of Practice , 1968 .

[26]  W. Chambliss.  A Sociological Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy , 1964 .

[27]  E. Sutherland.  The Diffusion of Sexual Psychopath Laws , 1950, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  E. Sutherland.  The sexual psychopath laws. , 1950 .