Screen Compliance Experiments for Application of Liquid Acquisition Device in Space

The purpose of a liquid acquisition device (LAD) is to separate liquid and vapor phases inside a spacecraft propellant storage tank in the reduced gravity and microgravity conditions of space so that vapor-free liquid can be extracted to the transfer line. A popular type of LAD called a screen channel LAD or gallery arm, uses a fine porous screen and surface tension forces of the liquid to allow pure liquid to flow through the screen while blocking vapor penetration. To analyze, size, and optimize the design of LADs for future in-space propellant transfer systems, models and data are required for the four fundamental influential factors for LAD systems, including bubble point, flow-through-screen pressure drop, wicking rate, and screen compliance for a wide variety of screen meshes. While there is sporadic data available for three of these parameters, there is no published quantitative data for screen compliance. During the transient startup of propellant transfer, the liquid must be accelerated from rest to the steady flow demand velocity, which causes the screen to deform or comply, so compliance data is required for accurate transient LAD analyses; most design codes only consider steady state analysis. This paper presents screen compliance experiments on 14 different screens, examining the effects of fineness of mesh, open area, and screen metal type on compliance. A basic equation of state is also developed and validated against the data which can be easily integrated into any transient LAD flow code to model propellant transfer.

[1]  Wesley L. Johnson,et al.  Cryogenic Propellant Insulation System Design Tools for Mass Optimization of Space Vehicles , 2008 .

[2]  Jason Hartwig,et al.  Screen Channel Liquid-Acquisition-Device Bubble Point Tests in Liquid Oxygen , 2015 .

[3]  Y. Kamotani,et al.  The static bubble point pressure model for cryogenic screen channel liquid acquisition devices , 2016 .

[4]  Simulation of LOX reorientation using magnetic positive positioning , 2006 .

[5]  J. Hartwig,et al.  Parametric analysis of the liquid hydrogen and nitrogen bubble point pressure for cryogenic liquid acquisition devices , 2014 .

[6]  Jeffrey Follo,et al.  Propellant Quantity Gauging Using the Radio Frequency Mass Gauge , 2011 .

[7]  Vijay K. Dhir,et al.  Nucleate Pool Boiling Experiments (NPBX) on the International Space Station , 2012 .

[8]  Jason Hartwig,et al.  Influential factors for liquid acquisition device screen selection for cryogenic propulsion systems , 2014 .

[9]  J. Hartwig,et al.  Screen channel LAD bubble point tests in liquid hydrogen , 2014 .

[12]  D. E. Jaekle,et al.  PROPELLANT MANAGEMENT DEVICE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS: GALLERIES , 1991 .

[13]  Jason Hartwig,et al.  Screen channel liquid acquisition device outflow tests in liquid hydrogen , 2014 .

[14]  Jason Hartwig,et al.  A steady state pressure drop model for screen channel liquid acquisition devices , 2014 .

[15]  J. Hartwig Liquid Acquisition Devices for Advanced In-Space Cryogenic Propulsion Systems , 2015 .

[16]  M. Dreyer,et al.  Drop Tower Experiments on Non-isothermal Reorientation of Cryogenic Liquids , 2010 .

[17]  Gas breakthrough at a porous screen , 2012 .