Learning Occupational Task-Shares Dynamics for the Future of Work

The recent wave of AI and automation has been argued to differ from previous General Purpose Technologies (GPTs), in that it may lead to rapid change in occupations' underlying task requirements and persistent technological unemployment. In this paper, we apply a novel methodology of dynamic task shares to a large dataset of online job postings to explore how exactly occupational task demands have changed over the past decade of AI innovation, especially across high, mid and low wage occupations. Notably, big data and AI have risen significantly among high wage occupations since 2012 and 2016, respectively. We built an ARIMA model to predict future occupational task demands and showcase several relevant examples in Healthcare, Administration, and IT. Such task demands predictions across occupations will play a pivotal role in retraining the workforce of the future.

[1]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  The Rapid Adoption of Data-Driven Decision-Making , 2016 .

[2]  Radford M. Neal.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[3]  C. Goldin,et al.  The Race between Education and Technology: The Evolution of U.S. Educational Wage Differentials, 1890 to 2005 , 2007 .

[4]  L. Pazvakawambwa,et al.  Forecasting methods and applications. , 2013 .

[5]  John Salvatier,et al.  When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts , 2017, ArXiv.

[6]  Inigo Martinez de Rituerto de Troya,et al.  Predicting , explaining , and understanding risk of long-term unemployment , 2018 .

[7]  Jean-Claude Martin,et al.  HireNet: A Hierarchical Attention Model for the Automatic Analysis of Asynchronous Video Job Interviews , 2019, AAAI.

[8]  Paul Beaudry,et al.  The Great Reversal in the Demand for Skill and Cognitive Tasks , 2013, Journal of Labor Economics.

[9]  Enghin Atalay,et al.  The Evolution of Work in the United States , 2020 .

[10]  Judy Wajcman,et al.  Automation: is it really different this time? , 2017, The British journal of sociology.

[11]  Ann P. Bartel,et al.  How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills , 2007 .

[12]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[13]  A. Manning,et al.  Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring , 2014 .

[14]  Michael Marien,et al.  Book Review: The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies , 2014 .

[15]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  Inferring Work Task Automatability from AI Expert Evidence , 2019, AIES.

[16]  Lisa B. Kahn,et al.  Skill Requirements across Firms and Labor Markets: Evidence from Job Postings for Professionals , 2017, Journal of Labor Economics.

[17]  D. Deming,et al.  STEM Careers and Technological Change , 2018 .

[18]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  The Race between Machine and Man: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares and Employment , 2016 .

[19]  Christina Gathmann,et al.  How General Is Human Capital? A Task‐Based Approach , 2007, Journal of Labor Economics.

[20]  David Autor,et al.  The Growth of Low Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  Alexandra Spitz-Oener.  Technical Change, Job Tasks, and Rising Educational Demands: Looking outside the Wage Structure , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[22]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment , 2018, American Economic Review.

[23]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  What Can Machines Learn, and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy? , 2018 .

[24]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor , 2019, Journal of Economic Perspectives.