Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation

Abstract The scope test is widely recommended as a way to evaluate the validity of contingent valuation (CV) studies. We measured contingent values of parts and wholes for four different environmental goods and applied the conventional scope test. In addition, the study design allowed examination of scope relationships for individual respondents. We also used social psychological theory to expand the definition of scope to include attitudinal and behavioral scope. Looking at the individual responses showed that conventional economic scope test results, which depend on comparisons of average values, can hide important relationships that are relevant to the validity of CV studies. We showed that, as a validity test, the conventional scope test can lead to false positives and false negatives. We are led to question the efficacy and cost effectiveness of making scope tests a routine part of validity assessment in applied CV studies.

[1]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[2]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Cognition and Survey Research , 2000, Technometrics.

[3]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Is Sympathy an Economic Value? Philosophy, Economics, and the Contingent Valuation Method , 1993 .

[4]  A. Freeman,et al.  The measurement of environmental and resource values , 1992 .

[5]  W. W. Pommerehne,et al.  Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods , 1997 .

[6]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[7]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Amenity resource valuation: integrating economics with other disciplines. , 1988 .

[8]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[9]  R. Carson,et al.  Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1995 .

[10]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[11]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research , 1995 .

[12]  Gregory K. Leonard,et al.  DOES CONTINGENT VALUATION MEASURE PREFERENCES , 1993 .

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Contingent Value Measurement , 1992 .

[14]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[15]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Non-Use Values: Theory and Empirical Applications , 1997 .

[16]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability , 1993 .

[17]  Henry J. Aaron,et al.  Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Public Policy, Values, and Consciousness , 1994 .

[18]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[19]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[20]  Ronald J. Glass,et al.  MEASURING THE EXISTENCE VALUE OF WILDLIFE - WHAT DO CVM ESTIMATES REALLY SHOW , 1991 .

[21]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[22]  M. Pauly,et al.  Universal health insurance in the Clinton plan: coverage as a tax-financed public good. , 1994, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.

[23]  Philip E. Graves,et al.  Valuing Public Goods , 2003 .

[24]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias , 2001 .

[25]  N. Schwarz.  Cognition, Communication, and Survey Measurement: Some Implications for Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1997 .

[26]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope , 1995 .

[27]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[28]  N. Hanley,et al.  Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .

[29]  Theresa J. DeMaio,et al.  Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field. , 1996 .

[30]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  MEASURING NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES WITH CONTINGENT VALUATION , 1993 .

[31]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .