Identifying key barriers in cationic polymer gene delivery to human T cells.

T cells have emerged as a therapeutically-relevant target for ex vivo gene delivery and editing. However, most commercially available reagents cannot transfect T cells and designing cationic polymers for non-viral gene delivery to T cells has resulted in moderate success. Here, we assess various barriers to successful gene transfer in the Jurkat human T cell line and primary human T cells. Using two polymers previously developed by our group, we show that uptake is one barrier to gene delivery in primary human T cells but is not predictive of successful gene delivery. We then probe intracellular pathways for barriers to gene transfer including endosomal acidification, autophagy, and immune sensing pathways. We find that endosomal acidification is slower and not as robust in human T cells compared to the model HeLa human cell line commonly used to evaluate cationic polymers for gene delivery. These studies inform the future design of cationic polymers for non-viral gene delivery to T cells, specifically, to rely on alternative endosomal release mechanisms rather than on pH-triggered release.

[1]  D. Rubinsztein,et al.  Mammalian Autophagy: How Does It Work? , 2016, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  R. Langer,et al.  Exploring polyethylenimine‐mediated DNA transfection and the proton sponge hypothesis , 2005, The journal of gene medicine.

[3]  B. Newland,et al.  Highly branched poly(β-amino ester)s for skin gene therapy. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  David J. Peeler,et al.  pH-sensitive polymer micelles provide selective and potentiated lytic capacity to venom peptides for effective intracellular delivery. , 2019, Biomaterials.

[5]  Greg M. Delgoffe,et al.  The mammalian target of rapamycin: linking T cell differentiation, function, and metabolism. , 2010, Immunity.

[6]  A. Müller,et al.  Nanoparticulate nonviral agent for the effective delivery of pDNA and siRNA to differentiated cells and primary human T lymphocytes. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[7]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Hit-and-run programming of therapeutic cytoreagents using mRNA nanocarriers , 2017, Nature Communications.

[8]  Russell M. Gordley,et al.  Engineering Customized Cell Sensing and Response Behaviors Using Synthetic Notch Receptors , 2016, Cell.

[9]  Jae U. Jung,et al.  The Antiviral Effector IFITM3 Disrupts Intracellular Cholesterol Homeostasis to Block Viral Entry , 2013, Cell Host & Microbe.

[10]  Kostas Kostarelos,et al.  Autophagy and formation of tubulovesicular autophagosomes provide a barrier against nonviral gene delivery , 2013, Autophagy.

[11]  V. Bindokas,et al.  Disease-causing Mutations in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Determine the Functional Responses of Alveolar Macrophages* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  M. Komatsu,et al.  Autophagy Is Essential for Mitochondrial Clearance in Mature T Lymphocytes1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  K. Braeckmans,et al.  Lysosomal capturing of cytoplasmic injected nanoparticles by autophagy: an additional barrier to non viral gene delivery. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[14]  Yuejin Wu,et al.  Correction: Corrigendum: The mitochondrial uniporter controls fight or flight heart rate increases , 2015, Nature Communications.

[15]  You-Wen He,et al.  A critical role for the autophagy gene Atg5 in T cell survival and proliferation , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  F. Larcher,et al.  The transition from linear to highly branched poly(β-amino ester)s: Branching matters for gene delivery , 2016, Science Advances.

[17]  W. Zhou,et al.  Induction of genuine autophagy by cationic lipids in mammalian cells , 2010, Autophagy.

[18]  A. Edinger,et al.  The complex interplay between autophagy, apoptosis, and necrotic signals promotes T‐cell homeostasis , 2010, Immunological reviews.

[19]  Matthias T Stephan,et al.  In situ programming of leukaemia-specific T cells using synthetic DNA nanocarriers. , 2017, Nature nanotechnology.

[20]  David J. Peeler,et al.  In vitro and in vivo delivery of siRNA via VIPER polymer system to lung cells , 2018, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[21]  Li-ping Zhu,et al.  Synthesis of tertiary amine‐based pH‐responsive polymers by RAFT Polymerization , 2015 .

[22]  Mithat Gönen,et al.  Targeting a CAR to the TRAC locus with CRISPR/Cas9 enhances tumour rejection , 2017, Nature.

[23]  Muriel Golzio,et al.  Cell synchronization effect on mammalian cell permeabilization and gene delivery by electric field. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[24]  E. Freed,et al.  IFITM Proteins Restrict HIV-1 Infection by Antagonizing the Envelope Glycoprotein , 2015, Cell Reports.

[25]  Chun Wang,et al.  Modulating polyplex-mediated gene transfection by small-molecule regulators of autophagy. , 2015, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[26]  David J. Peeler,et al.  Nano-Sized Sunflower Polycations As Effective Gene Transfer Vehicles. , 2016, Small.

[27]  You-Wen He,et al.  Autophagy Regulates Endoplasmic Reticulum Homeostasis and Calcium Mobilization in T Lymphocytes , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[28]  Wenxin Wang,et al.  Development of Branched Poly(5-Amino-1-pentanol-co-1,4-butanediol Diacrylate) with High Gene Transfection Potency Across Diverse Cell Types. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[29]  M. Conese,et al.  Role of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis in gene transfer mediated by lipo- and polyplexes. , 2005, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[30]  H. Harashima,et al.  Intracellular trafficking and transgene expression of viral and non-viral gene vectors. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[31]  C. Toumey From nano machines to Nobel prizes. , 2017, Nature nanotechnology.

[32]  M. Ramezani,et al.  The Effect of Cationic Charge Density Change on Transfection Efficiency of Polyethylenimine , 2013, Iranian journal of basic medical sciences.

[33]  M. Kolev,et al.  Keeping It All Going—Complement Meets Metabolism , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[34]  J. Debnath,et al.  The Ubiquitin Binding Protein TAX1BP1 Mediates Autophagasome Induction and the Metabolic Transition of Activated T Cells , 2017, Immunity.

[35]  G. Prando Quantum computation: Qubits in a row , 2017 .

[36]  Rahul Sharma,et al.  A discussion of the pH-dependent protonation behaviors of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) and poly(ethylenimine-ran-2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (P(EI-r-EOz)). , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[37]  D. Graber,et al.  Regulatory T cell-based therapies for autoimmunity. , 2016, Discovery medicine.

[38]  Koichi Araki,et al.  Autophagy is essential for effector CD8 T cell survival and memory formation , 2014, Nature Immunology.

[39]  H. Stauss,et al.  Engineering Specificity and Function of Therapeutic Regulatory T Cells , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[40]  Rongying Zhang,et al.  The effect of the size of fluorescent dextran on its endocytic pathway , 2015, Cell biology international.

[41]  S. Pun,et al.  Virus-Inspired Polymer for Efficient In Vitro and In Vivo Gene Delivery. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[42]  D. Dean,et al.  Intracellular trafficking of plasmids during transfection is mediated by microtubules. , 2006, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[43]  G. Lukács,et al.  Intracellular routing of plasmid DNA during non-viral gene transfer. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[44]  Suzie H. Pun,et al.  Cationic polymers for non‐viral gene delivery to human T cells , 2018, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[45]  R. Murphy,et al.  Effect of Bafilomycin A1 and Nocodazole on Endocytic Transport in HeLa Cells: Implications for Viral Uncoating and Infection , 1998, Journal of Virology.