Is the reporting timeliness gap for avian flu and H1N1 outbreaks in global health surveillance systems associated with country transparency?

BackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the length of time elapsed between reports of the same incidents related to avian flu and H1N1 outbreaks published by the WHO and ProMED-mail, the two major global health surveillance systems, before and after the amendment of the International Health Regulations in 2005 (IHR 2005) and to explore the association between country transparency and this timeliness gap.MethodsWe recorded the initial release dates of each report related to avian flu or H1N1 listed on the WHO Disease Outbreak News site and the matching outbreak report from ProMED-mail, a non-governmental program for monitoring emerging diseases, from 2003 to the end of June 2009. The timeliness gap was calculated as the difference in days between the report release dates of the matching outbreaks in the WHO and ProMED-mail systems. Civil liberties scores were collected as indicators of the transparency of each country. The Human Development Index and data indicating the density of physicians and nurses were collected to reflect countries’ development and health workforce statuses. Then, logistic regression was performed to determine the correlation between the timeliness gap and civil liberties, human development, and health workforce status, controlling for year.ResultsThe reporting timeliness gap for avian flu and H1N1 outbreaks significantly decreased after 2003. On average, reports were posted 4.09 (SD = 7.99) days earlier by ProMED-mail than by the WHO. Countries with partly free (OR = 5.77) and free civil liberties scores (OR = 10.57) had significantly higher likelihoods of longer timeliness gaps than non-free countries. Similarly, countries with very high human development status had significantly higher likelihoods of longer timeliness gaps than countries with middle or low human development status (OR = 5.30). However, no association between the timeliness gap and health workforce density was found.ConclusionThe study found that the adoption of IHR 2005, which contributed to countries’ awareness of the importance of timely reporting, had a significant impact in improving the reporting timeliness gap. In addition, the greater the civil liberties in a country (e.g., importance of freedom of the media), the longer the timeliness gap.

[1]  G. Pera,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of exacerbations among COPD patients in primary health care: APMPOC study , 2009 .

[2]  L. Madoff ProMED-mail: an early warning system for emerging diseases. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  M. Zeldenrust,et al.  The value of ProMED-mail for the Early Warning Committee in the Netherlands: more specific approach recommended. , 2008, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[4]  P. O'Malley,et al.  Transparency during public health emergencies: from rhetoric to reality. , 2009, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[5]  R. Atun,et al.  A framework and toolkit for capturing the communicable disease programmes within health systems: tuberculosis control as an illustrative example. , 2004, European journal of public health.

[6]  M. Mckee,et al.  Beyond borders: public-health surveillance , 2006, The Lancet.

[7]  E. Vigoda-Gadot,et al.  The bureaucracy-democracy tango: a dual-source empirical revalidation by structural equation modelling in the Israeli public sector , 2008 .

[8]  Chang-Chuan Chan,et al.  Taiwan and the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network , 2006, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Byrne,et al.  Understanding how education/support groups help lone mothers , 2010, BMC public health.

[10]  G. Bjune,et al.  Barriers and enablers in the management of tuberculosis treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a qualitative study , 2008, BMC public health.

[11]  J. Woodall,et al.  Stalking the next epidemic: ProMED tracks emerging diseases. , 2020, Public health reports.

[12]  W. Gormley,et al.  Bureaucracy and Democracy: Accountability and Performance , 2003 .

[13]  R. Coker,et al.  Pandemic influenza preparedness and health systems challenges in Asia: results from rapid analyses in 6 Asian countries , 2010, BMC public health.

[14]  Stephen S Morse,et al.  Public health surveillance and infectious disease detection. , 2012, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[15]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  The Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network , 2014, Global public health.

[16]  L. Madoff,et al.  The internet and the global monitoring of emerging diseases: lessons from the first 10 years of ProMED-mail. , 2005, Archives of medical research.

[17]  Sung-il Cho,et al.  Timeliness of national notifiable diseases surveillance system in Korea: a cross-sectional study , 2009, BMC public health.

[18]  C. Castillo-Salgado Trends and directions of global public health surveillance. , 2010, Epidemiologic reviews.

[19]  D. Conen,et al.  Prevalence of hyperuricemia and relation of serum uric acid with cardiovascular risk factors in a developing country , 2004, BMC public health.

[20]  Samuel L Groseclose,et al.  Evaluation of reporting timeliness of public health surveillance systems for infectious diseases , 2004, BMC public health.

[21]  N. Lurie,et al.  Strategies to improve global influenza surveillance: A decision tool for policymakers , 2008, BMC public health.

[22]  S. Groseclose,et al.  Evaluating Public Health Surveillance , 2010 .

[23]  David P. Fidler,et al.  Global Public Health Surveillance under New International Health Regulations , 2006, Emerging infectious diseases.

[24]  R. Katz,et al.  Disease surveillance, capacity building and implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005]) , 2010, BMC public health.

[25]  A. Rimpelä,et al.  Computer-associated health complaints and sources of ergonomic instructions in computer-related issues among Finnish adolescents: A cross-sectional study , 2010, BMC public health.

[26]  Ann Florini,et al.  The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World , 2007 .

[27]  S. McNabb Comprehensive effective and efficient global public health surveillance , 2010, BMC public health.