Simplified evaluation metrics for generative energy-driven urban design: A morphological study of residential blocks in Tel Aviv

Abstract For almost two decades, the Zero Energy Buildings (ZEB) standard has epitomized a commitment to the high energy performance of buildings. Nevertheless, the applicability of ZEB in hot climates is currently limited and furthermore, in light of the current limitations of traditional building energy modeling methods, new methods are necessary to effectively evaluate the energy balance potential of larger districts. To help bridge this gap, this paper introduces solar-based (both sun-hours and solar irradiation) and geometry-based prediction metrics to use in optimization studies to evaluate the impact of urban morphology on the energy balance of residential blocks in hot urban contexts. These prediction metrics are derived from the simulated energy performance of 1,944 parametric variations of residential blocks in Tel Aviv, which is then followed by a regression analysis in which these metrics recorded high correlation with energy demand, energy supply and the balance between them. To test the applicability of these metrics for optimization, the RBFMOpt method is employed in a multi-objective optimization study of the energy supply and demand of a nine-block residential district in Tel Aviv. Detailed energy simulations are performed for the best non-dominated results from the solar and geometric optimization studies and compared to the non-dominated results from a full energy optimization run. The results indicate that these metrics - the solar and geometric area-weighted exposure and shading indices - can serve as effective energy performance indicators to inform early stage morphological decisions making. This workflow promotes urban energy optimization towards more harmonized energy supply and demand driven approaches.

[1]  Ralph Evins,et al.  A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design , 2013 .

[2]  Jonas Allegrini,et al.  A review of modelling approaches and tools for the simulation of district-scale energy systems , 2015 .

[3]  Liss C. Werner,et al.  Anthropologic – Architecture and Fabrication in the cognitive age , 2020 .

[4]  Gang Liu,et al.  Solar potential in urban residential buildings , 2015 .

[5]  Edna Shaviv,et al.  Design guidelines for appropriate insolation of urban squares , 2006 .

[6]  Minseok Oh,et al.  Identifying urban geometric types as energy performance patterns , 2019, Energy for Sustainable Development.

[7]  Aristotelis Vartholomaios,et al.  A parametric sensitivity analysis of the influence of urban form on domestic energy consumption for heating and cooling in a Mediterranean city , 2017 .

[8]  Patricia Edith Camporeale,et al.  Towards nearly Zero Energy Buildings: Shape optimization of typical housing typologies in Ibero-American temperate climate cities from a holistic perspective , 2019, Solar Energy.

[9]  Jaume Salom,et al.  Understanding net zero energy buildings: Evaluation of load matching and grid interaction indicators , 2011 .

[10]  J. Kämpf,et al.  Optimisation of buildings' solar irradiation availability , 2010 .

[11]  Luigi Marletta,et al.  Cost-effective design solutions for low-rise residential Net ZEBs in Mediterranean climate , 2014 .

[12]  Emmanuel Rey,et al.  Review and critical analysis of early-design phase evaluation metrics for the solar potential of neighborhood designs , 2015 .

[13]  Reinhard Koenig,et al.  The Development of Optimization Methods in Generative Urban Design: A Review , 2020 .

[14]  S. Tagliapietra,et al.  How to make the European Green Deal work , 2019 .

[15]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Development and test application of the UrbanSOLve decision-support prototype for early-stage neighborhood design , 2018, Building and Environment.

[16]  T. Martins,et al.  From solar constraints to urban design opportunities: Optimization of built form typologies in a Brazilian tropical city , 2014 .

[17]  J. Scartezzini,et al.  A review of assessment methods for the urban environment and its energy sustainability to guarantee climate adaptation of future cities , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[18]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: an integrated evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin , 2018, Land Use Policy.

[19]  Eike Musall,et al.  Zero Energy Building A review of definitions and calculation methodologies , 2011 .

[20]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A holistic design approach for residential net-zero energy buildings: A case study in Singapore , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[21]  T. Hong,et al.  Revealing Urban Morphology and Outdoor Comfort through Genetic Algorithm-Driven Urban Block Design in Dry and Hot Regions of China , 2019, Sustainability.

[22]  Maria Wall,et al.  The impact of urban design decisions on net zero energy solar buildings in Sweden , 2014 .

[23]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Co-simulation and optimization of building geometry and multi-energy systems: Interdependencies in energy supply, energy demand and solar potentials , 2019, Applied Energy.

[24]  Julien S. Bourrelle Zero energy buildings and the rebound effect: A solution to the paradox of energy efficiency? , 2014 .

[25]  R. Compagnon Solar and daylight availability in the urban fabric , 2004 .

[26]  Michelle Pak,et al.  Ladybug: A Parametric Environmental Plugin For Grasshopper To Help Designers Create An Environmentally-conscious Design , 2013, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[27]  Zhongming Shi,et al.  A review of simulation-based urban form generation and optimization for energy-driven urban design , 2017 .

[28]  Michele A. L. Martins,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of urban morphology factors regarding solar energy potential of buildings in a Brazilian tropical context , 2016 .

[29]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Building form and environmental performance: archetypes, analysis and an arid climate , 2003 .

[30]  Stephen Siu Yu Lau,et al.  A review of net zero energy buildings in hot and humid climates: Experience learned from 34 case study buildings , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[31]  K. Steemers,et al.  Urban Form, Density and Solar Potential , 2006 .

[32]  Warren Hare,et al.  Best practices for comparing optimization algorithms , 2017, Optimization and Engineering.

[33]  Jonathan Natanian,et al.  A parametric approach to optimizing urban form, energy balance and environmental quality: The case of Mediterranean districts , 2019, Applied Energy.

[34]  Karsten Voss,et al.  Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework , 2012 .

[35]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[36]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for generating urban morphology: Variations and multiple objectives , 2018, International Journal of Architectural Computing.

[37]  Jonathan Natanian,et al.  Beyond nearly zero energy urban design: A holistic microclimatic energy and environmental quality evaluation workflow , 2020 .

[38]  Eugénio Rodrigues,et al.  Review on performance aspects of nearly zero-energy districts , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[39]  T. Reindl,et al.  Impact of urban block typology on building solar potential and energy use efficiency in tropical high-density city , 2019, Applied Energy.

[40]  Polyvios Eleftheriou,et al.  Overview and future challenges of nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEB) design in Southern Europe , 2017 .