Issues and Uncertainties Affecting Metrics For Aviation Impacts on Climate

Metrics such as radiative forcing and global warming potential have proven to be useful tools in climate policy–related studies, including evaluation of the effects of aviation on climate, to relate different emissions to one another in order to maximize the application of mitigation policies and their benefits. In order to be an effective tool for policymakers and their communication with scientists and industry, a metric should be easy to use and as scientifically well grounded as possible. Thus, the best metrics will be simple and will include uncertainties that reflect the state of knowledge in order to give users confidence in their scientific quality. A concern with developing new metrics is the need to weigh their applicability against the ease of understanding the results. Radiative forcing is commonly used in analyses of aviation effects on climate and is integral to other metrics, but it has known deficiencies. Well-recognized metrics like global warming potential and global temperature potentia...

[1]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Indices for comparing greenhouse gas emissions: integrating science and economics , 1996 .

[2]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  A welfare-based index for assessing environmental effects of greenhouse-gas emissions , 1996, Nature.

[3]  J. Fuglestvedt,et al.  Alternatives to the Global Warming Potential for Comparing Climate Impacts of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases , 2005 .

[4]  P. Forster,et al.  ACCRI Theme 7: Metrics for Comparison of Climate Impacts from Well Mixed Greenhouse Gases and Inhomogeneous Forcing Such as Those from UT/LS Ozone, Contrails and Contrail-Cirrus , 2007 .

[5]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Metrics of Climate Change: Assessing Radiative Forcing and Emission Indices , 2003 .

[6]  U. Schumann,et al.  Global Modeling of the Contrail and Contrail Cirrus Climate Impact , 2010 .

[7]  Donald J. Wuebbles,et al.  Climate metrics and aviation : analysis of current understanding and uncertainties , 2008 .

[8]  J. Penner,et al.  Aviation and the Global Atmosphere , 1999 .

[9]  Donald J. Wuebbles,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of aviation on climate change , 2007 .

[10]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases , 2001, Nature.

[11]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[12]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  The Jury is Still Out on Global Warming Potentials , 2000 .

[13]  Jan S Fuglestvedt,et al.  Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  It is premature to include non-CO2 effects of aviation in emission trading schemes , 2006 .

[15]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century , 2009, Atmospheric Environment.

[16]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[17]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[18]  Volker Grewe,et al.  AirClim: an efficient tool for climate evaluation of aircraft technology , 2008 .

[19]  Anuja Mahashabde,et al.  Assessing the impact of aviation on climate , 2008 .