Incorporating Multiprocess Performance Standards into the DEA Framework

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical approach to measuring the relative efficiency of peer decision-making units (DMUs). It is particularly useful when no a priori information is available on the trade-offs or relationships among various performance measures. A shortcoming of the DEA model, however, is its inability to provide a measure of absolute performance for the DMUs under investigation. Traditionally, in the service sector, this has not been an issue that one could address, because performance standards in that sector have been difficult to establish. However, in those settings where it has become feasible to develop such standards, it is desirable to build these into DEA performance evaluation, thereby enhancing the capability of the tool. While there have been some attempts to incorporate standards into the DEA structure, these approaches have generally been indirect, in the sense that they have focused primarily on restricting the DEA dual multipliers. This paper introduces a new way of building performance standards into the model. Utilizing the conventional DEA framework and a set of activity matrices, a set of standard DMUs can be generated and incorporated directly into the analysis. We show that under normal circumstances, these generated DMUs are efficient relative to the normal ones, and therefore form a type of outer frontier against which regular units can be evaluated. The proposed approach is applied to a sample of 100 branches of a major Canadian bank, where time standards are used to generate a set of standard bank branches. Subject classifications: organizational studies: productivity; financial institutions: banks; programming: linear. Area of review: Decision Analysis. History: Received December 2004; revision received April 2005; accepted July 2005.

[1]  Richard S. Barr,et al.  Predicting bank failure using DEA to quantify management quality , 1994 .

[2]  John Maleyeff,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: DEA with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2005 .

[3]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multiplier bounds in DEA via strong complementary slackness condition solution , 2003 .

[4]  J. Paradi,et al.  Best practice analysis of bank branches: An application of DEA in a large Canadian bank , 1997 .

[5]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Building performance standards into data envelopment analysis structures , 2005 .

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[7]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[8]  B. Golany,et al.  Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[9]  H. David Sherman Service Organization Productivity Management , 1988 .

[10]  S. Zionts,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1968 .

[11]  W. Cook,et al.  Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches , 2000 .

[12]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[15]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking , 2003 .

[16]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[17]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[18]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[19]  L. Seiford,et al.  Computational Accuracy and Infinitesimals In Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[20]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Chapter 15 DEA/AR analysis of the 1988–1989 performance of the Nanjing textiles corporation , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[21]  Leâ Opold Simar,et al.  A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models , 2000 .

[22]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research , 1997 .

[23]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Models for performance benchmarking: Measuring the effect of e-business activities on banking performance , 2004 .