Complexity and the triple bottom line: an information-processing perspective

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the impact of complexity on the triple bottom line by applying information-processing theory. Specifically, the paper assesses the impact of internal manufacturing complexity on environmental, social, and financial performance. Furthermore, the paper assesses the moderating role of connectivity and shared schema in reducing the potential negative impact of complexity on performance. Design/methodology/approach Multi-country survey data collected through the Global Manufacturing Research Group were utilized to test the hypotheses. The authors used structural equation modeling to test the measurement and initial structural model. Furthermore, to test the proposed moderating hypotheses, the authors applied the latent moderated structural equations approach. Findings The results indicate that while complexity has a negative impact on environmental and social performance, it does not significantly affect financial performance. Furthermore, this negative impact can be reduced, to some extent, through connectivity; however, shared schema does not significantly impact on the complexity-performance relationship. Originality/value This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of complexity on sustainability. Furthermore, it provides managerial applications as it proposes specific tools to deal with the potential negative influences of complexity.

[1]  Chwen Sheu,et al.  The Evolution of an International Academic Manufacturing Survey , 2009 .

[2]  K. Yuan,et al.  5. Three Likelihood-Based Methods for Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis with Nonnormal Missing Data , 2000 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[4]  Frank Wiengarten,et al.  Supply chain environmental investments in dynamic industries: Comparing investment and performance differences with static industries , 2012 .

[5]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology , 1996 .

[6]  Philippe Jacquart,et al.  On making causal claims: A review and recommendations , 2010 .

[7]  T. Nishiguchi,et al.  Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage , 1994 .

[8]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[9]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chains , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  Linyan Sun,et al.  The impact of supply chain risk on supply chain integration and company performance: a global investigation , 2013 .

[11]  M. Hobday.  Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[12]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[13]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  FOOD FOR THOUGHT: SOCIAL VERSUS ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES , 2009 .

[14]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have No Future , 2014 .

[15]  Christopher F. Baum,et al.  Enhanced Routines for Instrumental Variables/Generalized Method of Moments Estimation and Testing , 2007 .

[16]  Irene Henriques,et al.  Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry , 2005 .

[17]  Muhammad Usman Ahmed,et al.  Do a country's logistical capabilities moderate the external integration performance relationship? , 2014 .

[18]  Tobias Schoenherr,et al.  Revisiting the arcs of integration: Cross-validations and extensions , 2012 .

[19]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[20]  E. H. Neilsen,et al.  The subordinate's predicaments. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[21]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[22]  Carlo D. Smith,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance , 2013 .

[23]  Ruggero Golini,et al.  The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations , 2014 .

[24]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[25]  David Fairris,et al.  'Flexible' Work Practices and Occupational Safety and Health: Exploring the Relationship between Cumulative Trauma Disorders and Workplace Transformation , 2001 .

[26]  D. O'Rourke.  The science of sustainable supply chains , 2014, Science.

[27]  Frank L. Montabon,et al.  Making Sustainability Sustainable , 2016 .

[28]  F E Yates,et al.  Complexity and the limits to knowledge. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[29]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Generalizability Theory: A Primer , 1991 .

[30]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  A new value stream mapping approach for complex production systems , 2006 .

[31]  D. Power.  Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review , 2005 .

[32]  David N. Burt,et al.  The American Keiretsu: A Strategic Weapon for Global Competitiveness , 1993 .

[33]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[34]  Roger W. Schmenner,et al.  Revisiting the theory of production competence: Extensions and cross-validations , 2006 .

[35]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Toward a Theory of Competencies for the Management of Product Complexity: Six Case Studies , 2008 .

[36]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[37]  Christopher F. Baum,et al.  Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/GMM estimation and testing , 2007 .

[38]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[39]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Information-Processing Alternatives for Coping with Manufacturing Environment Complexity , 1999 .

[40]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Applied Missing Data Analysis , 2010 .

[41]  J. Elkington.  Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[42]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[43]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions , 2015 .

[44]  Sandra Rothenberg,et al.  Suppliers and Environmental Innovation: The Automotive Paint Process , 2000 .

[45]  T. C. Powell.  Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[46]  Cecil Bozarth,et al.  The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance , 2009 .

[47]  Thomas J. Kull,et al.  Quality management effectiveness in Asia: The influence of culture , 2010 .

[48]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[49]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[50]  Anand Nair,et al.  Complexity and Adaptivity in Supply Networks: Building Supply Network Theory Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[51]  R. Klassen,et al.  EXTENDING GREEN PRACTICES ACROSS THE SUPPLY CHAIN: THE IMPACT OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM INTEGRATION , 2006 .

[52]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[53]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[54]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The effects of lean production on worker job stress , 2006 .

[55]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The Supply Base and Its Complexity: Implications For Transaction Costs, Risks, Responsiveness, and Innovation , 2006 .

[56]  M Kaminski,et al.  Unintended consequences: organizational practices and their impact on workplace safety and productivity. , 2001, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[57]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[58]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  Measurement Equivalence Using Generalizability Theory: An Examination of Manufacturing Flexibility Dimensions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[59]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Integration of environmental aspects in product development: a stepwise procedure based on quantitative life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[60]  Mark Pagell,et al.  OHSAS 18001 certification and operating performance: The role of complexity and coupling , 2014 .

[61]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management , 2011 .

[62]  Helfried Moosbrugger,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method , 2000 .

[63]  Samuel Bendahan,et al.  Causality and Endogeneity , 2014 .

[64]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Developing supplier integration capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities approach , 2014 .

[65]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance , 2007 .

[66]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[67]  Michael R. Mullen.  Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[68]  Mark Pagell,et al.  When does lean hurt? – an exploration of lean practices and worker health and safety outcomes , 2013 .

[69]  Dieter Zapf,et al.  Advanced Nonlinear Latent Variable Modeling: Distribution Analytic LMS and QML Estimators of Interaction and Quadratic Effects , 2011 .

[70]  B. Daily,et al.  Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management , 2001 .

[71]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .