An Enhancing Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm (EHVPSO) for damage identification in 3D transmission tower

Abstract In this paper, a novel enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm is introduced for solving damage identification problems. For the first time, the algorithm is applied to a complex structure, namely an Electric Power Transmission with 44.05 m height. The process of structural damage assessment is implemented using SAP2000 commercial software combined with MATLAB. Using the Open Application Programming Interface (OAPI) source code, which is available in SAP2000, a strong MATLAB environment program has been developed in this research. This program can allow the user to adjust the initial model's parameters in SAP2000 to create a continuous two ways data exchange between SAP2000 and MATLAB. Thus, the process of detecting the location and level of damage in the structure is performed by applying a new version of PSO, namely Enhancing Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm (EHVPSO), using stochastic parameters. The key factor in the EHVPSO algorithm is to introduce two novel equations. The first equation is used to control the convergence rate in each movement of particle  i th , and the second equation is used to control the balance between local optimal value and global optimal value. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can detect damage with very high accuracy and reliability.

[1]  Zhongqing Su,et al.  Structural damage detection using finite element model updating with evolutionary algorithms: a survey , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[2]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[3]  A. Kaveh,et al.  An improved CSS for damage detection of truss structures using changes in natural frequencies and mode shapes , 2015, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[4]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  A novel unsupervised deep learning model for global and local health condition assessment of structures , 2018 .

[5]  O. S. Salawu.  Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[6]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation , 2010, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput..

[7]  Lei Jia,et al.  Research on FBG-Based CFRP Structural Damage Identification Using BP Neural Network , 2018 .

[8]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[9]  H. Tran-Ngoc,et al.  An efficient hybrid TLBO-PSO-ANN for fast damage identification in steel beam structures using IGA , 2020 .

[10]  Chao-Hong Chen,et al.  Convergence Time Analysis of Particle Swarm Optimization Based on Particle Interaction , 2011, Adv. Artif. Intell..

[11]  D. Karaboga,et al.  On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Jörg Wauer,et al.  On the Dynamics of Cracked Rotors: A Literature Survey , 1990 .

[13]  Tao Yin,et al.  Probabilistic Damage Detection of a Steel Truss Bridge Model by Optimally Designed Bayesian Neural Network , 2018, Sensors.

[14]  Zhongrong Lu,et al.  Structural damage detection using improved particle swarm optimization , 2018 .

[15]  Damodar Maity,et al.  A New Hybrid Unified Particle Swarm Optimization Technique for Damage Assessment from Changes of Vibration Responses , 2020 .

[16]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[17]  Mourad Dougdag,et al.  Détection de fissures dans les poutres d'acier : une nouvelle approche par balayage de mesures de vibrations , 2014 .

[18]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[19]  Andrew D. Dimarogonas,et al.  Vibration of cracked structures: A state of the art review , 1996 .

[20]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Damage detection under varying temperature using artificial neural networks , 2017 .

[21]  Mahmoud R. Maheri,et al.  Multi-stage approach for structural damage detection problem using basis pursuit and particle swarm optimization , 2016 .

[22]  Maosen Cao,et al.  Damage identification in three-dimensional structures using single-objective evolutionary algorithms and finite element model updating: evaluation and comparison , 2018 .

[23]  Ali Anaissi,et al.  Automated parameter tuning in one-class support vector machine: an application for damage detection , 2018, International Journal of Data Science and Analytics.

[24]  Dan Boneh,et al.  On genetic algorithms , 1995, COLT '95.

[25]  Yun-Lai Zhou,et al.  Multiple damage detection in composite beams using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm , 2017 .

[26]  M. Nirmala Devi,et al.  Velocity Restriction-Based Improvised Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm , 2018 .

[27]  Minvydas Ragulskis,et al.  Damage Diagnosis in 3D Structures Using a Novel Hybrid Multiobjective Optimization and FE Model Updating Framework , 2018, Complex..

[28]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[29]  R. Gordon Kirk,et al.  Cracked shaft detection and diagnostics: A literature review , 2004 .

[30]  Jun Li,et al.  Structural damage identification using improved Jaya algorithm based on sparse regularization and Bayesian inference , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[31]  Minvydas Ragulskis,et al.  Damage localization in irregular shape structures using intelligent FE model updating approach with a new hybrid objective function and social swarm algorithm , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[32]  Ling Yu,et al.  A novel WOA-based structural damage identification using weighted modal data and flexibility assurance criterion , 2020 .

[33]  S. R. Hoseini Vaez,et al.  Damage Detection of Thin Plates Using GA-PSO Algorithm Based on Modal Data , 2017 .

[34]  Wei Chen,et al.  Stochastic Portfolio Selection Based on Velocity Limited Particle Swarm Optimization , 2006, 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[35]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[36]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution - A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces , 2004 .

[37]  Ying-ping Chen,et al.  Analysis of particle interaction in particle swarm optimization , 2010, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[38]  Xi Chen,et al.  Bridge damage identification by combining modal flexibility and PSO methods , 2010, 2010 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference.

[39]  A. M. R. Ribeiro,et al.  A review of vibration-based structural health monitoring with special emphasis on composite materials , 2006 .

[40]  P. Torkzadeh,et al.  A machine-learning approach for structural damage detection using least square support vector machine based on a new combinational kernel function , 2016 .

[41]  R. Rao.  Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems , 2016 .

[42]  Wei-Ping Yang,et al.  Vertical Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and its Application in Soft-Sensor Modeling , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[43]  Samir Khatir,et al.  Damage assessment in structures using combination of a modified Cornwell indicator and genetic algorithm , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[44]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  A novel machine learning‐based algorithm to detect damage in high‐rise building structures , 2017 .

[45]  Xin-She Yang.  Test Problems in Optimization , 2010, 1008.0549.

[46]  James Kennedy,et al.  Defining a Standard for Particle Swarm Optimization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium.

[47]  Andreas Stavridis,et al.  Effects of variability in ambient vibration data on model updating and damage identification of a 10-story building , 2017 .

[48]  Seyed Sina Kourehli,et al.  Structural damage detection based on MAC flexibility and frequency using moth-flame algorithm , 2019 .

[49]  Ricardo Perera,et al.  A multistage FE updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization , 2008 .

[50]  Konstantinos G. Margaritis,et al.  On benchmarking functions for genetic algorithms , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[51]  E. J. Williams,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION BY A SENSITIVITY AND STATISTICAL-BASED METHOD , 1998 .

[52]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[53]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[54]  Ling Yu,et al.  A hybrid ant lion optimizer with improved Nelder–Mead algorithm for structural damage detection by improving weighted trace lasso regularization , 2020, Advances in Structural Engineering.

[55]  Ingo Rechenberg,et al.  Evolution Strategy: Nature’s Way of Optimization , 1989 .

[56]  Yi-Zhou Lin,et al.  Structural Damage Detection with Automatic Feature‐Extraction through Deep Learning , 2017, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[57]  Pei-wei Tsai,et al.  Cat Swarm Optimization , 2006, PRICAI.