IDENTIFYING REAL OPTIONS TO IMPROVE THE DESIGN OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS

This chapter is part of the developing literature on the use of real options in the design and development of major projects – more generally, of engineering systems. The chapters by Kazakidis and Kalligeros in this book are part of the same stream. This work differs substantially from the bulk of the real option literature. It focuses on improving the overall performance of technological projects by incorporating flexibility into their design. The field is growing rapidly because engineering projects are expanding in scope and complexity while their environment is becoming increasingly uncertain in terms of stakeholder requirements, resource availability, market demand, and other aspects. Traditional engineering design methodology is deficient in dealing with such uncertainty. Practitioners in the field thus need new approaches. Research in real options is leading to significant practical results. Many applications demonstrate that flexible designs can greatly increase expected overall performance compared to traditional rigid designs optimized for specific conditions. Flexible designs can deliver these benefits because their underlying architecture enables managers to adapt projects to circumstances that develop. Owners can thus cut losses by avoiding undesirable outcomes, and increase gains by taking advantage of new opportunities. Part 1 describes the concept of this developing literature. It situates design flexibility in the spectrum between the standard use of real options and traditional engineering design. As indicated below, the focus on flexible design involves deep reframing of the way we think about both design and the

[1]  Abisoye Babajide,et al.  Real option analysis as a decision tool in oil field developments , 2007 .

[2]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects?: The Case of Transportation , 2005, 1303.6654.

[3]  Flexible Design in Public Private Partnerships : A PFI case study in the National Health Service , 2007 .

[4]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  USING REAL OPTIONS TO INCREASE THE VALUE OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[5]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[6]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Staged Deployment of Communications Satellite Constellations in Low Earth Orbit , 2004, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[7]  R. Neufville,et al.  Design of Engineering Systems under Uncertainty via Real Options and Heuristic Optimization , 2006 .

[8]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Real Options to Increase the Value of Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2008 .

[9]  Richard-Duane Chambers,et al.  Tackling uncertainty in airport design : a real options approach , 2007 .

[10]  David Marks,et al.  Systems planning and design: case studies in modeling, optimization, and evaluation , 1974 .

[11]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  A Classification of Uncertainty for Early Product and System Design , 2007 .

[12]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[13]  M. Cardin,et al.  Process to improve expected value of mining operations , 2008 .

[14]  Konstantinos C. Kalligeros Platforms and Real Options in Large-Scale Engineering Systems , 2006 .

[15]  Tao Wang,et al.  Real Options "in" Projects and Systems Design: Identification of Options and Solution for Path Dependency , 2008 .

[16]  Jason E Bartolomei Qualitative knowledge construction for engineering systems : extending the design structure matrix methodology in scope and procedure , 2007 .

[17]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Time‐expanded decision networks: A framework for designing evolvable complex systems , 2007, Syst. Eng..

[18]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems , 2009 .

[19]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Combined use of optimization and simulation models in river basin planning , 1972 .

[20]  Tao Wang,et al.  Real Options by Spreadsheet: Parking Garage Case Example , 2006 .

[21]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Flexible product platforms: framework and case study , 2007, DAC 2006.