Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming?

Language is an intrinsically open-ended system. This fact has led to the widely shared assumption that readers and listeners do not predict upcoming words, at least not in a way that goes beyond simple priming between words. Recent evidence, however, suggests that readers and listeners do anticipate upcoming words “on the fly” as a text unfolds. In 2 event-related potentials experiments, this study examined whether these predictions are based on the exact message conveyed by the prior discourse or on simpler word-based priming mechanisms. Participants read texts that strongly supported the prediction of a specific word, mixed with non-predictive control texts that contained the same prime words. In Experiment 1A, anomalous words that replaced a highly predictable (as opposed to a non-predictable but coherent) word elicited a long-lasting positive shift, suggesting that the prior discourse had indeed led people to predict specific words. In Experiment 1B, adjectives whose suffix mismatched the predictable noun's syntactic gender elicited a short-lived late negativity in predictive stories but not in prime control stories. Taken together, these findings reveal that the conceptual basis for predicting specific upcoming words during reading is the exact message conveyed by the discourse and not the mere presence of prime words.

[1]  Nicolas Campion,et al.  Predictive Inferences are Represented as Hypothetical Facts. , 2004 .

[2]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[4]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Late Closure in Context , 1998 .

[5]  Tracy Linderholm,et al.  Predictive Inference Generation as a Function of Working Memory Capacity and Causal Text Constraints , 2002 .

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[8]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Working models of perception: Five general issues , 1989 .

[9]  J. Elman Representation and structure in connectionist models , 1991 .

[10]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  RELATIVE INHIBITION FOLLOWING THE ENCODING OF BRIDGING AND PREDICTIVE INFERENCES , 1995 .

[11]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[12]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words , 1983, Cognition.

[13]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[14]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Expecting Gender: An Event Related Brain Potential Study on the Role of Grammatical Gender in Comprehending a Line Drawing Within a Written Sentence in Spanish , 2003, Cortex.

[16]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  A Unified Model for Predictive and Bridging Inferences , 2002 .

[17]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: an ERP study. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[18]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.

[22]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[23]  G. Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[24]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  C Van Petten,et al.  Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  Remarks on the Architecture of Language Processing Systems , 2000 .

[28]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  When Does Gender Constrain Parsing? Evidence from ERPs , 1999 .

[29]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[30]  Van Berkum,et al.  The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: studies in language comprehension and production , 1996 .

[31]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[34]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  What is minimal about predictive inferences? , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Jos J. A. Van Berkum,et al.  What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect , 2007, Brain Research.

[36]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[37]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[39]  M. Castillo,et al.  On-line predictive inferences in reading: Processing timeduring versusafter the priming context , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[40]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Forward Inferences in Narrative Text , 1993 .

[41]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Activation and Encoding of Predictive Inferences: The Role of Reading Skill , 2003 .

[43]  M. Kutas,et al.  Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[45]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[46]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[48]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  A Parallel Architecture perspective on language processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[49]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[50]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The time course and durability of predictive inferences , 1993 .

[51]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[52]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Situation-Based Context and the Availability of Predictive Inferences , 2001 .

[53]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[54]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions , 1985 .

[55]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  Predictive inferences occur on‐line, but with delay: Convergence of naming and reading times , 1996 .

[56]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective , 2007, Brain Research.

[58]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  The role of predictive inferences in situation model construction , 1993 .

[59]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences , 1996 .

[60]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.