Pupillometric Evidence for the Decoupling of Attention from Perceptual Input during Offline Thought

Accumulating evidence suggests that the brain can efficiently process both external and internal information. The processing of internal information is a distinct “offline” cognitive mode that requires not only spontaneously generated mental activity; it has also been hypothesized to require a decoupling of attention from perception in order to separate competing streams of internal and external information. This process of decoupling is potentially adaptive because it could prevent unimportant external events from disrupting an internal train of thought. Here, we use measurements of pupil diameter (PD) to provide concrete evidence for the role of decoupling during spontaneous cognitive activity. First, during periods conducive to offline thought but not during periods of task focus, PD exhibited spontaneous activity decoupled from task events. Second, periods requiring external task focus were characterized by large task evoked changes in PD; in contrast, encoding failures were preceded by episodes of high spontaneous baseline PD activity. Finally, high spontaneous PD activity also occurred prior to only the slowest 20% of correct responses, suggesting high baseline PD indexes a distinct mode of cognitive functioning. Together, these data are consistent with the decoupling hypothesis, which suggests that the capacity for spontaneous cognitive activity depends upon minimizing disruptions from the external world.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  M. Kane,et al.  Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.

[5]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  L. Phillips,et al.  Shifting moods, wandering minds: negative moods lead the mind to wander. , 2009, Emotion.

[10]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[11]  M. Kane,et al.  Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[13]  Kevin Fitzpatrick,et al.  Slow Fluctuations in Attentional Control of Sensory Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Age trends for failures of sustained attention. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[15]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Interrupting the “stream of consciousness”: An fMRI investigation , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Raichle Two views of brain function , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Mind-wandering and dysphoria , 2007 .

[20]  H. Critchley,et al.  Processing of observed pupil size modulates perception of sadness and predicts empathy. , 2007, Emotion.

[21]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Failures of sustained attention in life, lab, and brain: Ecological validity of the SART , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[25]  Greg J Siegle,et al.  Use of concurrent pupil dilation assessment to inform interpretation and analysis of fMRI data , 2003, NeuroImage.

[26]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[27]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Rumination, Dysphoria, and Subjective Experience , 2005 .

[28]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Response to Comment on "Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought" , 2007, Science.

[30]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  J. Beatty Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[34]  C. Koch,et al.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. Smallwood Why the Global Availability of Mind Wandering Necessitates Resource Competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010) , 2010 .

[37]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  J. Changeux,et al.  Ongoing Spontaneous Activity Controls Access to Consciousness: A Neuronal Model for Inattentional Blindness , 2005, PLoS biology.

[39]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[40]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Encoding during the attentional lapse: Accuracy of encoding during the semantic sustained attention to response task , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[41]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  David J. Turk,et al.  Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[43]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Everyday attention lapses and memory failures: The affective consequences of mindlessness , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[45]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  P. Silvia,et al.  For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When , 2007, Psychological science.

[47]  J. Singer Daydreaming : an introduction to the experimental study of inner experience , 1966 .

[48]  Marcus E Raichle,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in Functional Brain Imaging , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Role of locus coeruleus in attention and behavioral flexibility , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[50]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  P. Fransson Spontaneous low‐frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting‐state default mode of brain function hypothesis , 2005, Human brain mapping.