Impact of “Signal Ahead” pavement marking on driver behavior at signalized intersections

When drivers are approaching a signalized intersection at the onset of yellow signal, they may hesitate to decide whether to stop or cross the intersection due to the dilemma zone. As defined in the Traffic Engineering Handbook [Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). (1999). Traffic engineering handbook, Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers], the dilemma zone for an intersection is a specific road segment, prior to the intersection in which a vehicle approaching the intersection during the yellow phase can neither safely clear the intersection, nor stop comfortably at the stop line. In this study, a pavement marking countermeasure is proposed to reduce the dilemma zone and improve traffic safety at signalized intersections. A pavement marking with word message "Signal Ahead" that is placed on the pavement upstream of a signalized intersection may have a potential to assist drivers in stop/go decisions and improve driver performance during the signal change. This paper presents a simulator-based study that was designed to test the impact of the pavement marking countermeasure on driving behaviors, including driver's stop/go decision, red-light running violation, brake response time, and deceleration rate of the stopping vehicle. The experiment results indicated that the marking had positive effects on drivers' behaviors at signalized intersections. It was found that the marking can reduce the probabilities of both conservative-stop and risky-go decisions, contribute to a lower red-light running rate, and result in a lower deceleration rate for stopping drivers at higher speed limit intersections. These findings suggest that the marking countermeasure may have a potential to reduce the probabilities of both rear-end and angle crashes. Language: en

[1]  James A Bonneson,et al.  Intersection Safety at High-Speed Signalized Intersections: Number of Vehicles in Dilemma Zone as Potential Measure , 2004 .

[2]  David A Noyce,et al.  Analysis of Driver Behavior in Dilemma Zones at Signalized Intersections , 2007 .

[3]  J. Caird,et al.  The effect of yellow light onset time on older and younger drivers' perception response time (PRT) and intersection behavior , 2007 .

[4]  James A Bonneson,et al.  RED LIGHT RUNNING - A POLICY REVIEW , 2003 .

[5]  James E. Birren,et al.  Behavior, aging, and the nervous system : biological determinants of speed of behavior and its changes with age , 1965 .

[6]  S Turner.  COUNCIL REPORT SUMMARY: AUTOMATED ENFORCEMENT IN TRANSPORTATION--AN ITE INFORMATIONAL REPORT BY THE ITE AUTOMATED ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE (TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COUNCIL) TENC 96-5 , 1999 .

[7]  James L Pline.  Traffic engineering handbook , 2009 .

[8]  S Lings,et al.  Assessing driving capability: a method for individual testing: the significance of paraparesis inferior studied in a controlled experiment. , 1991, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  J Bonneson,et al.  REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE FREQUENCY OF RED-LIGHT-RUNNING , 2001 .

[10]  David Mahalel,et al.  A BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO RISK ESTIMATION OF REAR-END COLLISIONS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 1987 .

[11]  Kenneth R. Agent,et al.  Evaluation of Change Interval Treatments for Traffic Signals at High-Speed Intersections , 1994 .

[12]  Thomas C Ferrara,et al.  EVALUATION OF HIGH-SPEED ISOLATED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS IN CALIFORNIA (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1992 .

[13]  C Newton,et al.  Evaluation of an alternative traffic light change anticipation system. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Gang-Len Chang,et al.  Empirical Observations of Dynamic Dilemma Zones at Signalized Intersections , 2007 .

[15]  Shinya Kikuchi,et al.  METHODOLOGY TO ANALYZE DRIVER DECISION ENVIRONMENT DURING SIGNAL CHANGE INTERVALS: APPLICATION OF FUZZY SET THEORY , 1992 .

[16]  Robert Herman,et al.  The Problem of the Amber Signal Light in Traffic Flow , 1960 .

[17]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Advance Warning Flashers: Do They Improve Safety? , 1999 .

[18]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Driver Responses to High-Mounted Brake Lights in Actual Traffic , 1981 .

[19]  Myung-Soon Chang,et al.  TIMING TRAFFIC SIGNAL CHANGE INTERVALS BASED ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR , 1985 .

[20]  B E Porter,et al.  A nationwide survey of self-reported red light running: measuring prevalence, predictors, and perceived consequences. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[22]  James A Bonneson,et al.  NUMBER OF VEHICLES IN THE DILEMMA ZONE AS A POTENTIAL MEASURE OF INTERSECTION SAFETY AT HIGH-SPEED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 2004 .

[23]  R A Retting,et al.  CRASH REDUCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH RED LIGHT CAMERA ENHFORCEMENT IN OXNARD, CALIFORNIA , 2001 .

[24]  Craig Lyon,et al.  Safety evaluation of red-light cameras , 2005 .

[25]  H Köll,et al.  Driver behaviour during flashing green before amber: a comparative study. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Characteristics of red light violators: Results of a field investigation , 1996 .

[27]  Srinivasa R Sunkari,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF ADVANCE WARNING SYSTEMS FOR END-OF-GREEN PHASE AT HIGH SPEED TRAFFIC SIGNALS , 2004 .

[28]  Prahlad D Pant,et al.  ACTIVE ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS AT HIGH-SPEED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: RESULTS OF A STUDY IN OHIO , 1992 .

[29]  Panagiotis Papaioannou,et al.  Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Prahlad D Pant,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS AT HIGH SPEED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 1995 .