On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments

A stream of studies on evaluation of health care services and public goods have developed tests of the preference axioms of completeness and transitivity and methods for detecting other preference phenomena such as unstability, learning- and tiredness effects, and random error, in stated preference discrete choice experiments. This methodological paper tries to identify the role of the preference axioms and other preference phenomena in the context of such experiments and discusses whether or how such axioms and phenomena can be subject to meaningful (statistical) tests.

[1]  M Ryan,et al.  Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. , 1998, Health economics.

[2]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1952 .

[3]  Jean-Claude Falmagne,et al.  A representation theorem for finite random scale systems , 1978 .

[4]  P. Hawe,et al.  Will our understanding of completeness ever be complete? , 2000, Health economics.

[5]  D. Hensher,et al.  COMBINING SOURCES OF PREFERENCE DATA: THE CASE OF THE LURKING LAMBDAS , 1997 .

[6]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[7]  R. Sugden,et al.  Testing Different Stochastic Specificationsof Risky Choice , 1998 .

[8]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect or Rational Non-transitive Choice? , 1989 .

[9]  A. Oliver.  Complete preferences over health states: a reply to the paper by Shiell et al. , 2000, Health Economics.

[10]  M. Kendall,et al.  ON THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1940 .

[11]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS , 1952 .

[12]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[13]  F. Johnson,et al.  Sources and Effects of Utility-Theoretic Inconsistency in Stated-Preference Surveys , 2001 .

[14]  Kfir Eliaz,et al.  Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  C. Starmer.  Cycling with Rules of Thumb: An Experimental Test for a new form of Non-Transitive Behaviour , 1999 .

[16]  Adrian R. Fleissig,et al.  Testing for the Significance of Violations of Afriat's Inequalities , 2005 .

[17]  Robert Sugden,et al.  OBSERVING VIOLATIONS OF TRANSITIVITY BY EXPERIMENTAL METHODS , 1991 .

[18]  Jacob Marschak,et al.  Stochastic models of choice behavior , 2007 .

[19]  P. McCullagh.  Regression Models for Ordinal Data , 1980 .

[20]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What If Consumer Experiments Impact Variances as Well as Means? Response Variability as a Behavioral Phenomenon , 2001 .

[21]  D. McFadden.  The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research , 1986 .

[22]  S. Afriat.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS FROM EXPENDITURE DATA , 1967 .

[23]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Modelling intransitive preferences: A random-effects approach , 2006 .

[24]  K. May.  Intransitivity, Utility, and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns , 1954 .

[25]  James C. Cox,et al.  On Testing the Utility Hypothesis , 1997 .

[26]  Graham Loomes,et al.  Modelling the Stochastic Component of Behaviour in Experiments: Some Issues for the Interpretation of Data , 2005 .

[27]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[28]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1987 .

[29]  D. McFadden.  Revealed stochastic preference: a synthesis , 2005 .

[30]  Rosa L. Matzkin.  Axioms of Revealed Preference for Nonlinear Choice Sets , 1991 .

[31]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Afriat and Revealed Preference Theory , 1973 .

[32]  Angela Bate,et al.  Testing the assumptions of rationality, continuity and symmetry when applying discrete choice experiments in health care , 2001 .

[33]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[34]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories , 1995 .

[35]  Rosa L. Matzkin,et al.  Testing strictly concave rationality , 1991 .

[36]  Emily Lancsar,et al.  Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? , 2006, Health economics.

[37]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[38]  H. D. Block,et al.  Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses (1960) , 1959 .

[39]  Pavlo R. Blavatskyy,et al.  Stochastic Utility Theorem , 2007 .

[40]  P. Zarembka.  Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[41]  J. Hougaard,et al.  The Role of Preference Axioms and Respondent Behaviour in Statistical Models for Discrete Choice , 2004 .

[42]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Combining sources of preference data , 1998 .

[43]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[44]  H. Houthakker.  Revealed Preference and the Utility Function , 1950 .

[45]  K. Sælensminde,et al.  Inconsistent choices in Stated Choice data;Use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases , 2001 .

[46]  S. Karlin,et al.  Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences , 1962 .

[47]  M. Ryan,et al.  Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care. , 2003, Health economics.

[48]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Preference Structures and Their Numerical Representations , 1999, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[49]  Amartya Sen,et al.  INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF CHOICE , 1993 .

[50]  J. Marschak.  Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators , 1959 .

[51]  Michael Mandler,et al.  Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[52]  H. Varian.  The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis , 1982 .

[53]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[54]  A Shiell,et al.  Are preferences over health states complete? , 2000, Health economics.

[55]  K. Sælensminde,et al.  The Impact of Choice Inconsistencies in Stated Choice Studies , 2002 .

[56]  P. Hammond,et al.  Handbook of Utility Theory , 2004 .

[57]  P. Pattanaik,et al.  Stochastic Revealed Preference and the Theory of Demand , 1999 .

[58]  M. Richter.  Revealed Preference Theory , 1966 .

[59]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Contributions to Probability and Statistics , 1960 .

[60]  Pavlo R. Blavatskyy,et al.  Stochastic expected utility theory , 2005 .

[61]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[62]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[63]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice , 2001 .

[64]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Are preferences stable? The case of health care , 2002 .

[65]  Uud,et al.  Discrete choice and stochastic utility maximization , 2005 .

[66]  Jean-Claude Falmagne,et al.  Statistical issues in measurement , 1985 .

[67]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to derive welfare estimates for the provision of elective surgery: Implications of discontinuous preferences , 2002 .