Plasticity in reproduction and growth among 52 range‐wide populations of a Mediterranean conifer: adaptive responses to environmental stress

A plastic response towards enhanced reproduction is expected in stressful environments, but it is assumed to trade off against vegetative growth and efficiency in the use of available resources deployed in reproduction [reproductive efficiency (RE)]. Evidence supporting this expectation is scarce for plants, particularly for long‐lived species. Forest trees such as Mediterranean pines provide ideal models to study the adaptive value of allocation to reproduction vs. vegetative growth given their among‐population differentiation for adaptive traits and their remarkable capacity to cope with dry and low‐fertility environments. We studied 52 range‐wide Pinus halepensis populations planted into two environmentally contrasting sites during their initial reproductive stage. We investigated the effect of site, population and their interaction on vegetative growth, threshold size for female reproduction, reproductive–vegetative size relationships and RE. We quantified correlations among traits and environmental variables to identify allocation trade‐offs and ecotypic trends. Genetic variation for plasticity was high for vegetative growth, whereas it was nonsignificant for reproduction. Size‐corrected reproduction was enhanced in the more stressful site supporting the expectation for adverse conditions to elicit plastic responses in reproductive allometry. However, RE was unrelated with early reproductive investment. Our results followed theoretical predictions and support that phenotypic plasticity for reproduction is adaptive under stressful environments. Considering expectations of increased drought in the Mediterranean, we hypothesize that phenotypic plasticity together with natural selection on reproductive traits will play a relevant role in the future adaptation of forest tree species.

[1]  F. Lefèvre,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary demographic responses to climate change: taking theory out to the field , 2013 .

[2]  W. Kunin,et al.  Adaptation at range margins: common garden trials and the performance of Arabidopsis lyrata across its northwestern European range. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[3]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  C. Corona,et al.  Pinus halepensis Mill. crown development and fruiting declined with repeated drought in Mediterranean France , 2012, European Journal of Forest Research.

[5]  J. Alcañiz,et al.  Improving substrate fertility to enhance growth and reproductive ability of a Pinus halepensis Mill. afforestation in a restored limestone quarry , 2012, New Forests.

[6]  G. Fox,et al.  Variation among individuals in cone production in Pinus palustris (Pinaceae). , 2012, American journal of botany.

[7]  Bo Li,et al.  Reproductive allometry in Pedicularis species changes with elevation , 2012 .

[8]  Ann M. Nicholls.  Size-Dependent Analysis of Allocation to Sexual and Clonal Reproduction in Penthorum sedoides under Contrasting Nutrient Levels , 2011, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[9]  M. Werger,et al.  Relationships between tree size, crown shape, gender segregation and sex allocation in Pinus halepensis, a Mediterranean pine tree. , 2011, Annals of botany.

[10]  Brooke S. Baythavong.  Linking the Spatial Scale of Environmental Variation and the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity: Selection Favors Adaptive Plasticity in Fine-Grained Environments , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[11]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  LIFE‐HISTORY QTLS AND NATURAL SELECTION ON FLOWERING TIME IN BOECHERA STRICTA, A PERENNIAL RELATIVE OF ARABIDOPSIS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  Michael A. Forster,et al.  The adaptive value of functional and life-history traits across fertility treatments in an annual plant. , 2010, Annals of botany.

[13]  Mark Rees,et al.  Evolutionary bet-hedging in the real world: empirical evidence and challenges revealed by plants , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  E. Notivol,et al.  Variation of early reproductive allocation in multi-site genetic trials of Maritime pine and Aleppo pine , 2010 .

[15]  F. Valladares,et al.  Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  P. Smouse,et al.  Climatic niche and neutral genetic diversity of the six Iberian pine species: a retrospective and prospective view , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[17]  A. Barbati,et al.  Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems , 2010 .

[18]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[19]  J. Weiner,et al.  The allometry of reproduction within plant populations , 2009 .

[20]  N. Kachi,et al.  Variation in flowering size and age of a facultative biennial, Aster kantoensis (Compositae), in response to nutrient availability. , 2009, American journal of botany.

[21]  J. Weiner,et al.  Is reproductive allocation in Senecio vulgaris plastic , 2009 .

[22]  C. G. Parks,et al.  Establishment of parallel altitudinal dines in traits of native and introduced forbs. , 2009, Ecology.

[23]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Interpreting reproductive allometry: Individual strategies of allocation explain size-dependent reproduction in plant populations , 2009 .

[24]  R. Leimu,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in Plants , 2008, PloS one.

[25]  S. Franks,et al.  A change in climate causes rapid evolution of multiple life‐history traits and their interactions in an annual plant , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[26]  R. Alía,et al.  To grow or to seed: ecotypic variation in reproductive allocation and cone production by young female Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis, Pinaceae). , 2008, American journal of botany.

[27]  C. Schlichting.  Hidden Reaction Norms, Cryptic Genetic Variation, and Evolvability , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  J. Connolly,et al.  A modelling framework for analysing the reproductive output of individual plants grown in monoculture , 2007 .

[29]  A. Simons,et al.  Selection for increased allocation to offspring number under environmental unpredictability , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  C. Fenster,et al.  Testing for adaptation to climate in Arabidopsis thaliana: a calibrated common garden approach. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[31]  M. Burd,et al.  Age-size plasticity for reproduction in monocarpic plants. , 2006, Ecology.

[32]  J. Gurevitch,et al.  Sources of variation in growth, form, and survival in dwarf and normal-stature pitch pines (Pinus rigida, Pinaceae) in long-term transplant experiments. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[33]  F. Valladares,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity: a useful framework for understanding adaptation in forest species , 2005 .

[34]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Reproductive Strategies , 2005 .

[35]  Carl Gunnar Fossdal,et al.  Climatic adaptation in Picea abies progenies is affected by the temperature during zygotic embryogenesis and seed maturation , 2005 .

[36]  Mark van Kleunen,et al.  Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[37]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Reproductive traits of Pinus halepensis in the light of fire – a critical review , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[38]  Mark Rees,et al.  Evolutionary demography of monocarpic perennials. , 2003 .

[39]  G. Holloway,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture , 2002, Heredity.

[40]  S. Sultan,et al.  Metapopulation Structure Favors Plasticity over Local Adaptation , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[41]  D. Roff.  Age and Size at Maturity , 2001 .

[42]  C Arrowsmith,et al.  Analysis of aggregation, a worked example: numbers of ticks on red grouse chicks , 2001, Parasitology.

[43]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[44]  S. Sultan.  Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[45]  D. Roff,et al.  Trade‐offs between growth and reproduction: an analysis of the quantitative genetic evidence , 2000 .

[46]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Size dependence of reproductive allocation : the influence of resource availability, competition and genetic identity , 1998 .

[47]  L. Nagy,et al.  Plant growth and reproduction on a toxic alpine ultramafic soil: adaptation to nutrient limitation. , 1997, The New phytologist.

[48]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  THRESHOLD SIZE FOR FLOWERING IN DIFFERENT HABITATS: EFFECTS OF SIZE‐DEPENDENT GROWTH AND SURVIVAL , 1997 .

[49]  D. Matziris.  Variation in Growth, Flowering and Cone Production in a Clonal Seed Orchard of Aleppo Pine Grown in Greece , 1997 .

[50]  S. Thomas.  Relative size at onset of maturity in rain forest trees : a comparative analysis of 37 Malaysian species , 1996 .

[51]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Threshold size for vernalization in Senecio jacobaea: genetic variation and response to artificial selection , 1996 .

[52]  T. J. Jong,et al.  Bidirectional selection on threshold size for flowering in Cynoglossum officinale (hound's-tongue) , 1995, Heredity.

[53]  S. Engen,et al.  Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction , 1994 .

[54]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[55]  E. Lacey,et al.  Latitudinal variation in reproductive timing of a short-lived monocarp , 1988 .

[56]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  Graded allocation between vegetative and reproductive growth for annual plants in growing seasons of random length , 1982 .

[57]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[58]  J. Pannell,et al.  PART OF A SPECIAL ISSUE ON POPULATION BIOLOGY Genetic differentiation for size at first reproduction through male versus female functions in the widespread Mediterranean tree Pinus pinaster , 2012 .

[59]  L. Johnson,et al.  Evolutionary origin of the Asteraceae capitulum: Insights from Calyceraceae. , 2012, American journal of botany.

[60]  T. Flatt,et al.  Integrating mechanistic and evolutionary analysis of life history variation , 2011 .

[61]  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/joc.1276 VERY HIGH RESOLUTION INTERPOLATED CLIMATE SURFACES FOR GLOBAL LAND AREAS , 2005 .

[62]  M. Méndez,et al.  The Resource Economy of Plant Reproduction , 2005 .

[63]  M. Méndez,et al.  Between-population variation in size-dependent reproduction and reproductive allocation in Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae) and its environmental correlates , 2004 .

[64]  J. Weiner.  Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants , 2004 .

[65]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  An allometric model for seed plant reproduction , 2003 .

[66]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity , 2004, Science.

[67]  G. Varga,et al.  EFFECT OF INTRA-SPECIFIC COMPETITION ON TREE ARCHITECTURE AND ABOVEGROUND DRY MATTER ALLOCATION IN SCOTS PINE , 2000 .

[68]  J. Kozłowski.  Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: Implications for age and size at maturity. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[69]  Carl D. Schlichting,et al.  The Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1986 .

[70]  M. Willson,et al.  Plant reproductive ecology , 1983 .