Metabolic Control With the Bio-inspired Artificial Pancreas in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Background: The Bio-inspired Artificial Pancreas (BiAP) is a closed-loop insulin delivery system based on a mathematical model of beta-cell physiology and implemented in a microchip within a low-powered handheld device. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the BiAP over 24 hours, followed by a substudy assessing the safety of the algorithm without and with partial meal announcement. Changes in lactate and 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations were investigated for the first time during closed-loop. Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled open-label crossover study. Participants were randomly assigned to attend either a 24-hour closed-loop visit connected to the BiAP system or a 24-hour open-loop visit (standard insulin pump therapy). The primary outcome was percentage time spent in target range (3.9-10 mmol/l) measured by sensor glucose. Secondary outcomes included percentage time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/l) and hyperglycemia (>10 mmol/l). Participants were invited to attend for an additional visit to assess the BiAP without and with partial meal announcements. Results: A total of 12 adults with type 1 diabetes completed the study (58% female, mean [SD] age 45 [10] years, BMI 25 [4] kg/m2, duration of diabetes 22 [12] years and HbA1c 7.4 [0.7]% [58 (8) mmol/mol]). The median (IQR) percentage time in target did not differ between closed-loop and open-loop (71% vs 66.9%, P = .9). Closed-loop reduced time spent in hypoglycemia from 17.9% to 3.0% (P < .01), but increased time was spent in hyperglycemia (10% vs 28.9%, P = .01). The percentage time in target was higher when all meals were announced during closed-loop compared to no or partial meal announcement (65.7% [53.6-80.5] vs 45.5% [38.2-68.3], P = .12). Conclusions: The BiAP is safe and achieved equivalent time in target as measured by sensor glucose, with improvement in hypoglycemia, when compared to standard pump therapy.

[1]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Home use of closed-loop insulin delivery for overnight glucose control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a 4-week, multicentre, randomised crossover study. , 2014, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[2]  N. Oliver,et al.  Use of microneedle array devices for continuous glucose monitoring: a review. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[3]  E. Atlas,et al.  MD-Logic Artificial Pancreas System , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[4]  W. Kenneth Ward,et al.  Novel Use of Glucagon in a Closed-Loop System for Prevention of Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[5]  Marc D. Breton,et al.  Overnight Glucose Control With an Automated, Unified Safety System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes at Diabetes Camp , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[6]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Day and Night Home Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Three-Center Randomized Crossover Study , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[7]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Time Lag of Glucose From Intravascular to Interstitial Compartment in Humans , 2013, Diabetes.

[8]  P. D. Home,et al.  The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapid‐acting insulin analogues and their clinical consequences , 2012, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[9]  Udo Hoss,et al.  Feasibility of Factory Calibration for Subcutaneous Glucose Sensors in Subjects With Diabetes , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[10]  George Dailey,et al.  Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  Feasibility study of a bio-inspired artificial pancreas in adults with type 1 diabetes. , 2014, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  Marc D. Breton,et al.  Safety of Outpatient Closed-Loop Control: First Randomized Crossover Trials of a Wearable Artificial Pancreas , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[13]  R. Beck,et al.  Sustained Benefit of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on A1C, Glucose Profiles, and Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[14]  Ahmad Haidar,et al.  Comparison of dual-hormone artificial pancreas, single-hormone artificial pancreas, and conventional insulin pump therapy for glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: an open-label randomised controlled crossover trial. , 2015, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[15]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[16]  Ahmad Haidar,et al.  Outpatient 60‐hour day‐and‐night glucose control with dual‐hormone artificial pancreas, single‐hormone artificial pancreas, or sensor‐augmented pump therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes: An open‐label, randomised, crossover, controlled trial , 2017, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[17]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  A Silicon Pancreatic Beta Cell for Diabetes , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[18]  G. Steil,et al.  Feasibility of Automating Insulin Delivery for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes , 2006, Diabetes.

[19]  F. Ovalle,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009 .

[20]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Cellular modeling: insight into oral minimal models of insulin secretion. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[21]  J. Pickup,et al.  continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus , 1980, Diabetes Care.

[22]  David M Nathan,et al.  Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Fully Integrated Artificial Pancreas in Type 1 Diabetes , 2012, Diabetes.

[24]  Tadej Battelino,et al.  MD-Logic Overnight Control for 6 Weeks of Home Use in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Randomized Crossover Trial , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[25]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of a Personalized Artificial Pancreas , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[26]  Michael O'Grady,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  E. Atlas,et al.  Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Lutz Heinemann,et al.  Prediction of the Risk to Develop Diabetes-Related Late Complications by Means of the Glucose Pentagon Model: Analysis of Data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[30]  D. Klonoff,et al.  Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Pratik Choudhary,et al.  Normal reference range for mean tissue glucose and glycemic variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring for subjects without diabetes in different ethnic groups. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[32]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  A Bio-Inspired Glucose Controller Based on Pancreatic β-Cell Physiology , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[33]  P. Cryer,et al.  Sleep-related hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in type 1 diabetes: reduced awakening from sleep during hypoglycemia. , 2003, Diabetes.