Growth dynamics and biomass production in short-rotation poplar plantations: 6-year results for three clones at four spacings

Abstract Growth dynamics and biomass production in short-rotation poplar plantations were evaluated at Hanyuan Forestry Farm, Baoying County, P.R.C. Experimental treatments applied in a split-plot design included: four planting densities (1111, 833, 625 and 500 stems ha −1 ); three poplar clones (NL-80351, I-69 and I-72) and three rotation lengths. Survival of all three clones was excellent at the experimental site under the imposed management regime. Differences in DBH, height, LAI and above-ground biomass production, however, were manifested among the treatments. Overall the clonal ranking was in the order NL-80351≥I-69>I-72 by age 6. LAI values ranged from 0.6 to 4.4 m 2 m −2 and differences among four planting densities and three clones were significant throughout the first six years. Above-ground biomass productivity was affected considerably by planting density, clone and rotation length. Within the four densities, the highest biomass productivity at rotation age 6 was achieved in the highest stocked stand (1111 stems ha −1 ) for both clone I-69 and I-72, but in the stand of 833 stems ha −1 for clone NL-80351. A polynomial function was chosen to describe the relationship between LAI and current annual biomass increment; maximum biomass increments around 17 tonnes ha −1 a −1 were associated with LAIs of 4.0 m 2 m −2 . Based on the results over 6 years, we recommend that the best option for ground pulp timber production at a similar site is to choose clone NL-80351 and I-69 for planting materials, 6 years for rotation length and 833 or 1111 stems ha −1 for planting density.

[1]  J. C. Nautiyal,et al.  Present and future feasibility of short-rotation energy farms in Ontario , 1985 .

[2]  M. Cannell Light interception, light use efficiency and assimilate partitioning in poplar and willow stands , 1989 .

[3]  P. Heilman,et al.  Genetic variation and productivity of Populustrichocarpa and its hybrids. II. Biomass production in a 4-year plantation , 1985 .

[4]  P. Jarvis,et al.  The biomass production of three poplar clones in relation to intercepted solar radiation , 1992 .

[5]  L. Wright,et al.  Comparisons among Populus clones and intensive culture conditions, using an energy-conservation model , 1989 .

[6]  M. Cannell,et al.  Yields of Minirotation Closely Spaced Hardwoods in Temperate Regions: Review and Appraisal , 1980 .

[7]  R. Stettler,et al.  Genetic variation and productivity of Populustrichocarpa and its hybrids. III. Structure and pattern of variation in a 3-year field test , 1989 .

[8]  J. B. Baker,et al.  The Development of Cottonwood Plantations on Alluvial Soils: Dimensions, Volume, Phytomass, Nutrient Content and Other Characteristics , 1982 .

[9]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. I. Clonal comparisons of 4-year growth and phenology , 1992 .

[10]  Edward A. Hansen,et al.  Poplar woody biomass yields: A look to the future , 1991 .

[11]  J. J. Landsberg,et al.  Biomass production by fast-growing trees. , 1989 .

[12]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  A comparison among eucalypt, poplar and willow characteristics with particular reference to a coppice, growth-modelling approach , 1996 .

[13]  P. Heilman,et al.  Effect of harvest cycle and spacing on productivity of black cottonwood in intensive culture , 1981 .

[14]  T. Burk,et al.  Development and evaluation of quantitative functions for early selection of Populus clones. , 1996 .