Exploring technologies to better link physical evidence and digital information for disaster victim identification

Disaster victim identification (DVI) entails a protracted process of evidence collection and data matching to reconcile physical remains with victim identity. Technology is critical to DVI by enabling the linkage of physical evidence to information. However, labelling physical remains and collecting data at the scene are dominated by low-technology paper-based practices. We ask, how can technology help us tag and track the victims of disaster? Our response to this question has two parts. First, we conducted a human-computer interaction led investigation into the systematic factors impacting DVI tagging and tracking processes. Through interviews with Australian DVI practitioners, we explored how technologies to improve linkage might fit with prevailing work practices and preferences; practical and social considerations; and existing systems and processes. We focused on tagging and tracking activities throughout the DVI process. Using insights from these interviews and relevant literature, we identified four critical themes: protocols and training; stress and stressors; the plurality of information capture and management systems; and practicalities and constraints. Second, these findings were iteratively discussed by the authors, who have combined expertise across electronics, data science, cybersecurity, human-computer interaction and forensic pathology. We applied the themes identified in the first part of the investigation to critically review technologies that could support DVI practitioners by enhancing DVI processes that link physical evidence to information. This resulted in an overview of candidate technologies matched with consideration of their key attributes. This study recognises the importance of considering human factors that can affect technology adoption into existing practices. Consequently, we provide a searchable table (as Supplementary Information) that relates technologies to the key considerations and attributes relevant to DVI practice, for the reader to apply to their own context. While this research directly contributes to DVI, it also has applications to other domains in which a physical/digital linkage is required, and particularly within high stress environments with little room for error.

[1]  Oliver Morgan,et al.  Management of Dead Bodies after Disasters: A Field Manual for First Responders , 2006 .

[2]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[3]  Wen Yao,et al.  The Adoption and Implementation of RFID Technologies in Healthcare: A Literature Review , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[5]  Martin Kalis,et al.  Management of Dead Bodies after Disasters: A Field Manual for First Responders , 2006 .

[6]  Blase Ur,et al.  Correct horse battery staple: exploring the usability of system-assigned passphrases , 2012, SOUPS.

[7]  Douglas A. Palmer,et al.  An Intelligent 802.11 Triage Tag For Medical Response to Disasters , 2005, AMIA.

[8]  Christopher Reddick,et al.  Information technology and emergency management: preparedness and planning in US states. , 2011, Disasters.

[9]  Christian Jackowski,et al.  Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification--advantages and limitations. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[10]  René Reiners,et al.  Towards a Design Space and Guidelines for E-Triage System Design , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  O. Finegan,et al.  The ICRC AM/PM Database: Challenges in forensic data management in the humanitarian sphere. , 2017, Forensic Science International.

[12]  D. Sweet INTERPOL DVI best-practice standards--An overview. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[13]  R. Byard,et al.  Potential problems arising during international disaster victim identification (DVI) exercises , 2010, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.

[14]  A. Taylor,et al.  A taxonomy of disasters and their victims. , 1987, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[15]  Fabio Monticelli,et al.  Implantation of radio frequency identification device (RFID) microchip in disaster victim identification (DVI). , 2006, Forensic science international.

[16]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Design and evaluation of a wireless electronic health records system for field care in mass casualty settings , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Bryan T. Johnson,et al.  Digital capture of fingerprints in a disaster victim identification setting: a review and case study , 2018, Forensic sciences research.

[18]  R. Gadh,et al.  Radio frequency identification of Hurricane Katrina victims , 2006 .

[19]  Barbara L Pate Identifying and Tracking Disaster Victims: State‐of‐the‐Art Technology Review , 2008, Family & community health.

[20]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.