Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish

Abstract Spatially explicit individual-based models (IBMs) use movement rules to determine when an animal departs its current location and to determine its movement destination; these rules are therefore critical to accurate simulations. Movement rules typically define some measure of how an individual’s expected fitness varies among locations, under the assumption that animals make movement decisions at least in part to increase their fitness. Recent research shows that many fish move quickly in response to changes in physical and biological conditions, so movement rules should allow fish to rapidly select the best location that is accessible. The theory that a fish’s fitness is maximized by minimizing the ratio of mortality risk to food intake is not applicable to typical IBM movement decisions and can cause serious errors in common situations. Instead, we developed fitness measures from unified foraging theory that are theoretically and computationally compatible with individual-based fish models. One such fitness measure causes a fish to select habitat that maximizes its expected probability of survival over a specified time horizon, considering both starvation and other risks. This fitness measure is dependent on the fish’s current state, making fish with low energy reserves more willing to accept risks in exchange for higher food intake. Another new measure represents the expectation of reaching reproductive maturity by multiplying expected survival by a factor indicating how close to the size of first reproduction the fish grows within the time horizon. One of the primary benefits of the individual-based approach is avoiding the need for simplifying assumptions; this benefit is best realized by basing movement decisions on such simple, direct measures of fitness as expected survival and expected reproductive maturity.

[1]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Habitat Selection Under Predation Hazard: Test of a Model with Foraging Minnows. , 1987, Ecology.

[2]  M. Noda,et al.  Local prey search based on spatial memory and expectation in the planktivorous reef fish, Chromis chrysurus (Pomacentridae) , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  D. C. Erman,et al.  Habitat Use by Adult Rainbow Trout under Moderate Artificial Fluctuations in Flow , 1994 .

[4]  Kjell Leonardsson,et al.  Predicting Risk-Taking behaviour from Life-History Theory Using Static Optimization Technique , 1991 .

[5]  T. Angradi,et al.  Effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) , 1992 .

[6]  Charles F. Rabeni,et al.  Patterns of Movement and Habitat Use by Northern Hog Suckers in an Ozark Stream , 1995 .

[7]  Michael K. Young,et al.  Restricted movement in resident stream salmonids : a paradigm lost ? , 1994 .

[8]  Nicholas F. Hughes,et al.  Ranking of Feeding Positions by Drift-Feeding Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Dominance Hierarchies , 1992 .

[9]  K. Rose,et al.  Individual-based model of stream-resident rainbow trout and brook char: model description, corroboration, and effects of sympatry and spawning season duration , 1997 .

[10]  Jennifer L. Hill,et al.  An Energetic Model of Microhabitat Use for Rainbow Trout and Rosyside Dace , 1993 .

[11]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Predation risk and feeding behaviour , 1993 .

[12]  K. Fausch,et al.  Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain , 1984 .

[13]  Webster Van Winkle,et al.  Individual-Based Approach to Fish Population Dynamics: An Overview , 1993 .

[14]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[15]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Bioenergetics Modeling of Stream Trout Growth: Temperature and Food Consumption Effects , 1999 .

[16]  K. Rose,et al.  Individual‐Based Model of Young‐of‐the‐Year Striped Bass Population Dynamics. I. Model Description and Baseline Simulations , 1993 .

[17]  Nicholas F. Hughes,et al.  Selection of Positions by Drift-Feeding Salmonids in Dominance Hierarchies: Model and Test for Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Subarctic Mountain Streams, Interior Alaska , 1992 .

[18]  W. Van Winkle,et al.  An individual-based instream flow model for coexisting populations of brown and rainbow trout , 1996 .

[19]  J. Bart Acceptance Criteria for Using Individual‐Based Models to Make Management Decisions , 1995 .

[20]  W. V. Winkle,et al.  Individual-based model of sympatric populations of brown and rainbow trout for instream flow assessment: model description and calibration , 1998 .

[21]  C. Clark,et al.  Towards a Unifield Foraging Theory , 1986 .

[22]  Nicholas F. Hughes,et al.  A model of habitat selection by drift-feeding stream salmonids at different scales , 1998 .

[23]  K. Fausch,et al.  Mobile brook trout in two high-elevation Colorado streams: Re-evaluating the concept of restricted movement , 1996 .

[24]  Michael K. Young,et al.  Summer movements and habitat use by Colorado River cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus) in small, montane streams , 1996 .

[25]  Michael K. Young,et al.  Mobility of brown trout in south-central Wyoming streams , 1994 .

[26]  W. Wurtsbaugh,et al.  Predation risk and the importance of cover for juvenile rainbow trout in lentic systems , 1991 .

[27]  E. Werner,et al.  Ecological Consequences of the Trade-Off between Growth and Mortality Rates Mediated by Foraging Activity , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[28]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology , 1998, Springer US.

[29]  J. M. Elliott Quantitative ecology and the brown trout , 1995 .

[30]  Michael Power,et al.  Quantitative Ecology and the Brown Trout , 1994 .

[31]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  Position Choice by Drift-Feeding Salmonids: Model and Test for Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Subarctic Mountain Streams, Interior Alaska , 1990 .

[32]  Jarl G Iske,et al.  Modelling spatial dynamics of fish , 1998 .

[33]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Hunting by the Hunted: Optimal Prey Selection by Foragers under Predation Hazard , 1990 .