Manipulability of teleoperated surgical robots with application in design of master/slave manipulators

Teleoperated surgical robots can significantly improve the performance of minimally invasive surgeries. The performance of a master-slave robotic system depends significantly on the capability of its master device to appropriately interface the user with the slave robot. However, master robots currently used in the clinic present several drawbacks such as the mismatch between the slave and master workspaces and the inability to intuitively transfer the slave robot's dexterity and joint limits to the user. In this paper, the "teleoperation manipulability index (TMI)" is introduced as a quantifiable measure of the combined master-slave system manipulability. We also demonstrate the application of the TMI in the design of master-slave robotic systems. By employing the proposed manipulability index, we are able to modify the design of a commercially available master robot that 1) enhances surgeon's control over force/velocity of a surgical robot, 2) minimizes the master robot's footprint, 3) optimizes the surgeons' control effort, and 4) avoids singularities and joint limits of the master and slave robots. A simulation study is performed to validate the performance of the modified master-slave robotic system.

[1]  Sanju Lama,et al.  The evolution of neuroArm. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Jindong Liu,et al.  Master manipulator designed for highly articulated robotic instruments in single access surgery , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[3]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Manipulability of cooperating robots with unactuated joints and closed-chain mechanisms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms , 1985 .

[5]  Yaser Maddahi,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Surgical Telerobotic System Using Kinematic Indices of the Master Hand-Controller , 2014, EuroHaptics.

[6]  Alireza Mirbagheri,et al.  A modular force‐controlled robotic instrument for minimally invasive surgery – efficacy for being used in autonomous grasping against a variable pull force , 2016, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[7]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Raven-II: An Open Platform for Surgical Robotics Research , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Zhi Li,et al.  Design of a Multi-Arm Surgical Robotic System for Dexterous Manipulation , 2016 .

[9]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Global task space manipulability ellipsoids for multiple-arm systems , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Claudio Melchiorri,et al.  Multiple whole-limb manipulation: An analysis in the force domain , 1997, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  John J. Craig,et al.  Articulated hands: Force control and kinematic issues , 1981 .

[12]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  On the mobility and manipulability of general multiple limb robots , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[13]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Dual redundant arm configuration optimization with task-oriented dual arm manipulability , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Ming J. Tsai,et al.  Manipulability of manipulators , 1990 .

[15]  Frank Chongwoo Park,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Design Criteria , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[16]  Ji Ma,et al.  A Compact Modular Teleoperated Robotic System for Laparoscopic Surgery , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Manipulability and Accuracy Measures for a Medical Robot in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2004 .