How Do the Cerebral Hemispheres Contribute to Encoding Spatial Relations?

environmental factors. The Journal of Compara tive Neurology, 327, 97-111. Koivisto, M. (1997). Time course of semantic acti vation in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsy chologia, 35, 497-504. Marsolek, C.J., Kosslyn, S.M., & Squire, L.R. (1992). Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experi mental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cog nition, 18, 492-508. Moliese, D. (1980). Hemispheric specialization for temporal information: Implications for the perception of voicing during speech percep tion. Brain and Language, 11, 285-299. Posner, M.I., Petersen, S.E., Fox, P.T., & Raichle, M.E. (1988). Localization of cognitive opera tions in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627 1631.

[1]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Encoding Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Relations Without Input-Output Correlations: New Simulation Models , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Spatial Processing and Hemispheric Asymmetry: Contributions of the Transient/Magnocellular Visual System , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Perrett,et al.  The `Ideal Homunculus': decoding neural population signals , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .

[5]  Y Tsal,et al.  Inattention magnifies perceived length: the attentional receptive field hypothesis. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  On Computational Evidence for Different Types of Spatial Relations Encoding: Reply to Cook et al. (1995) , 1995 .

[7]  H. Früh,et al.  The cerebral hemispheres and neural network simulations: design considerations. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Logan.  Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  J. Hellige,et al.  Individual variation in hemispheric asymmetry: multitask study of effects related to handedness and sex. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Encoding Shape and Spatial Relations: The Role of -Receptive Field Size in Coordinating Complementary Representations , 1994 .

[12]  B. Laeng.  Lateralization of Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Functions: A Study of Unilateral Stroke Patients , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Hemispheric differences in sizes of receptive fields or attentional biases , 1994 .

[14]  J. Hellige,et al.  Categorical versus Coordinate Spatial Processing: Effects of Blurring and Hemispheric Asymmetry , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Visual Mental Imagery Activates Topographically Organized Visual Cortex: PET Investigations , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  William J. Hoyer,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: A reappraisal , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[17]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Sergent.  Judgments of relative position and distance on representations of spatial relations. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  John A. Baro,et al.  The effects of uniform field flicker and blurring on the global precedence effect , 1991 .

[20]  D R Badcock,et al.  Low-Frequency Filtering and the Processing of Local—Global Stimuli , 1990, Perception.

[21]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  The development of spatial relation representations: evidence from studies of cerebral lateralization. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[23]  M. V. Kleeck.  Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  J. Hellige,et al.  Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[25]  C. B. Cave,et al.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[27]  S. Kosslyn.  Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[29]  J. Sergent.  The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. Beaumont.  Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation , 1982 .

[31]  J. Marshall.  Hemispheric specialization: What, how and why , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  J. R. Armstrong,et al.  Managing state energy conservation programs: the Minnesota experience. , 1980, Science.

[33]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Identification, classification and anatomical segregation of cells with X‐like and Y‐like properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of old‐world primates. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.