Whence the eigenstate–eigenvalue link?

Abstract David Wallace has recently argued that the eigenstate–eigenvalue (E–E) link has no place in serious discussions of quantum mechanics on the grounds that, as he claims, the E–E link is an invention of philosophers rather than the community of practicing physicists. This raises an historical question regarding the origin of the link. This paper aims to answer this question by tracing the historical development of the link through six key textbooks of quantum mechanics. In light of the historical evidence from these textbooks, it is argued that Wallace provides insufficient grounds for dismissing the E–E link from discussions of quantum mechanics.

[1]  D. Wallace.  A Prolegomenon to the Ontology of the Everett Interpretation , 2011 .

[2]  Thomas Hawkins,et al.  Cauchy and the spectral theory of matrices , 1975 .

[3]  Kristian Camilleri.  Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation , 2009, Perspectives on Science.

[4]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  Pure wave mechanics and the very idea of empirical adequacy , 2015, Synthese.

[5]  Jeffrey Bub,et al.  Interpreting the Quantum World , 1998 .

[6]  Some Worlds of Quantum Theory , 2001, quant-ph/0105052.

[7]  W. Heisenberg.  Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik , 1927 .

[8]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  Physics and our view of the world: Interpretation of science; science as interpretation , 1994 .

[9]  E. Merzbacher.  Quantum mechanics , 1961 .

[10]  Mara Beller,et al.  Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution , 1999 .

[11]  W. Heisenberg.  The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory , 1930 .

[12]  Don Howard,et al.  Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology , 2004, Philosophy of Science.

[13]  A. Messiah.  Quantum Mechanics , 1961 .

[14]  D. Wallace.  Decoherence and its role in the modern measurement problem , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  Arthur Fine.  Probability and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics* , 1973, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[16]  J. Neumann.  Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1955 .

[17]  Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al.  Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference , 2009 .

[18]  David Wallace,et al.  The Quantum Measurement Problem: State of Play , 2007, 0712.0149.

[19]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Quantum theory and measurement , 1983 .

[20]  A. Fine.  The two Problems of Quantum Measurement , 1973 .