Hierarchies and the choice of left conjuncts (with particular attention to English)

Over the last decade or so, hierarchies such as the animacy hierarchy, the personal hierarchy, the case hierarchy, the definiticity and referentiality hierarchies and so forth have been identified as determinants of constituent order. It is my intention in this paper to review the set of hierarchies and rank them as determinants of NP sequencing in English. I shall from time to time compare and contrast the effect of a hierarchy in other languages with what we find in English; but it remains to be seen whether the ranking which obtains for English has a wider application: I make no a priori claim that it does. The hierarchies and families of hierarchies are ranked as follows, from the most powerful determinant to the least: (1) the familiarity hierarchy; (2) the topic (3) the universal sequencing conventions; (4) the definiticity and referentiality hierarchies; (5) the personal, social status, and role hierarchies; (6) the dominant descriptor hierarchies; (7) the formal hierarchies.

[1]  Yakov Malkiel,et al.  Essays on linguistic themes , 1969 .

[2]  Robert D. Van Valin,et al.  Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar , 1984 .

[3]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Language typology : cross-linguistic studies in syntax , 1983 .

[4]  Evelyn N. Ransom,et al.  Definiteness, Animacy, and NP Ordering , 1977 .

[5]  Gary J. Witherspoon,et al.  Language in Culture and Culture in Language , 1980, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[6]  Charles N. Li.  Word order and word order change , 1975 .

[7]  Paul V. Kroskrity.  A Holistic Understanding of Arizona Tewa Passives , 1985 .

[8]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  Salience and sentencing: Some production principles , 1977 .

[9]  M. Hupet,et al.  The other side of Johnson-Laird's interpretation of the passive voice. , 1977 .

[10]  T. Givon.  Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[11]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[12]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  The semantic function of word order: a case study in Mandarin , 1975 .

[13]  John Haiman,et al.  Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion , 1985 .

[14]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Figure and Ground in Complex Sentences , 1975 .

[15]  T. Givon,et al.  From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy in Discourse and Syntax. , 1979 .

[16]  Wallace L. Chafe,et al.  Language and Consciousness. , 1974 .

[17]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[18]  Comrie Bernard.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[19]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[20]  T. Reinhart.  Pragmatics and Linguistics: an analysis of Sentence Topics , 1981, Philosophica.

[21]  Jeanette K. Gundel.  The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory , 1988 .

[22]  井上 和子,et al.  Explorations in linguistics : papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue , 1979 .

[23]  David A. Zubin.  Discourse Function of Morphology: The Focus System in German , 1979 .

[24]  Robert Dixon,et al.  Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages , 1980 .

[25]  John Haiman,et al.  Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24-26, 1983 , 1985 .

[26]  P. Johnson-Laird.  The choice of the passive voice in a communicative task. , 1968, British journal of psychology.

[27]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The passive paradox: A reply to costermans and hupet , 1977 .

[28]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of given-new information , 1981 .

[29]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[30]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[31]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Two storage mechanisms in free recall , 1966 .

[32]  T. Givón,et al.  On Understanding Grammar , 1979 .

[33]  M. H. Klaiman.  THE GRAMMAR OF DOING AND UNDERGOING IN KOREAN , 1984 .

[34]  Leon Manelis,et al.  Sentence production : developments in research and theory , 1978 .

[35]  C. F. Hockett.  A Course in Modern Linguistics , 1959 .

[36]  Scott Delancey,et al.  An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns , 1981 .

[37]  J. Lyons.  New horizons in linguistics , 1972 .

[38]  Braj B. Kachru,et al.  Issues in linguistics : papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane , 1973 .

[39]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Shorter Articles and Notes the Interpretation of the Passive Voice Shorter Articles and Notes the Interpretation of the Passive Voice , 2022 .

[40]  M. H. Klaiman.  Affectedness and control , 1988 .

[41]  Larry M. Hyman,et al.  Hierarchies of natural topic in Shona , 1974 .

[42]  Gary D. Prideaux,et al.  The effect of context on dative position , 1979 .

[43]  Frans Plank.  Objects : towards a theory of grammatical relations , 1986 .

[44]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .

[45]  Chet A. Creider,et al.  Topic: comment relations in a verb-initial language , 1983 .