GColl group-to-group videoconferencing system: design and first experiences

We present a videoconferencing tool, GColl, which aims to support collaboration among remote groups of participants. GColl supports mutual gaze as well as partial gaze awareness for all participants, while still retaining a modest technical requirements: a camera and an echo-canceling microphone at each site; and a laptop with two USB cameras for each user. The environment is also easily deployed and allows quick changes in numbers of participants at individual sites. It is therefore suitable even for ad-hoc groups or teams with small budgets. A quantitative user study has been conducted in order to evaluate functionality of GColl with promising results. Additionally, the tool is available for download as an open-source project.

[1]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Mike Fraser,et al.  The Distributed Work of Local Action: Interaction amongst virtually collocated research teams , 2007, ECSCW.

[3]  John F. Canny,et al.  Multiview: improving trust in group video conferencing through spatial faithfulness , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Anastasia Bezerianos,et al.  Presence disparity in mixed presence collaboration , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Effects of Gaze on Multiparty Mediated Communication , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[6]  Petr Holub,et al.  RAP - Reflector Administration Protocol , 2003 .

[7]  Petr Holub,et al.  User Empowered Virtual Multicast for Multimedia Communication , 2004 .

[8]  Yutaka Matsushita,et al.  Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design , 1994, CSCW '94.

[9]  Elena Rocco,et al.  Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact , 1998, CHI.

[10]  Petr Holub,et al.  GColl: A Flexible Videoconferencing Environment for Group-to-Group Interaction , 2009, INTERACT.

[11]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  GAZE-2: conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction , 2003, CHI '03.

[12]  Milton Chen,et al.  Leveraging the asymmetric sensitivity of eye contact for videoconference , 2002, CHI.

[13]  N. Sadat Shami,et al.  Collocation blindness in partially distributed groups: is there a downside to being collocated? , 2006, CHI.

[14]  John L. Arnott,et al.  Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing , 1992, CHI.

[15]  P. John.  Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments , 1971 .

[16]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development , 2002, CHI.

[17]  A. Monk,et al.  A Look Is Worth a Thousand Words: Full Gaze Awareness in Video-Mediated Conversation , 2002 .

[18]  Päivi Majaranta,et al.  Proactive Response to Eye Movements , 2003, INTERACT.

[19]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[20]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication , 2005 .

[21]  F. Vijver,et al.  Cross-Cultural Survey Methods , 2002 .