Universal Limiter for Transient Interpolation Modeling of the Advective Transport Equations : The ULTIMATE Conservative Difference Scheme

steps and shock waves, for example; but progress has been unexpectedly slow. It seems that correction of one defect always introduces another, equally severe. Unphysical oscillations inherent in classical second-order methods were eliminated by switching to first-order upwinding; but this merely replaced unacceptable oscillations with (what was ultimately realized to be) unacceptable global artificial diffusion. By devis- ing methods with locally varying artificial diffusion (small in smooth regions, larger in sharply varying regions), it is possible to achieve somewhat better resolution than global first-order upwinding without introducing spurious numerical oscillations. Some forms of shock-capturing (or TVD) schemes achieve their impressive results for step resolution by the use of locally varying positive artificial diffusion or viscosity (first-order upwinding) to suppress oscillations, com- bined with local negative viscosity (such as first-order downwinding) to arti- ficially compress or steepen the front. Unfortunately, this inherent negative diffusion is responsible for artificial steepening of (what should be) gentle gradients, as well, as will be demonstrated. Because of the concomitant flat- tening of local extrema (due to the local positive artificial diffusion), this defect has become known as "clipping," although the problem is initiated by the artificial steepening introduced to give high resolution to simulated fronts. In some cases (for example, a step-function followed

[1]  B. P. Leonard SHARP Simulation of Discontinuities in Highly Convective Steady Flow , 1987 .

[2]  S. Osher,et al.  High resolution applications of the Osher upwind scheme for the Euler equations , 1983 .

[3]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[4]  B. Leonard Adjusted quadratic upstream algorithms for transient incompressible convection , 1979 .

[5]  I. P. Castro,et al.  Studies in numerical computations of recirculating flows , 1987 .

[6]  P. Roe CHARACTERISTIC-BASED SCHEMES FOR THE EULER EQUATIONS , 1986 .

[7]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme , 1974 .

[8]  J. Fromm A method for reducing dispersion in convective difference schemes , 1968 .

[9]  H. C. Yee Upwind and Symmetric Shock-Capturing Schemes , 1987 .

[10]  P. Gaskell,et al.  Curvature‐compensated convective transport: SMART, A new boundedness‐ preserving transport algorithm , 1988 .

[11]  P. Sweby High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1984 .

[12]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation , 1990 .

[13]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection , 1977 .

[14]  P. Roe,et al.  ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF SOME NON-LINEAR SCHEMES FOR LINEAR ADVECTION. , 1984 .