When the prefixes meet the suffixes

This paper explores the different interpretations the prefix po- in Polish gets depending on what kind of stem it attaches to. Thus, I show that the distinction between high and low suffixing verbalizers correlates with a distinction within the prefixal domain, namely the type of verbalizer influences the interpretation that po- is assigned, as well as being responsible for the restriction on po- attachment.1 I argue for four different structural positions into which a prefix can be inserted. The system bears on the way Aspectual proper- ties are decided in the course of the derivation, with three different aspectual levels (Asp1P relevant for most of the prefixes, Asp2P i.e. Secondary Imperfective (henceforth, SI), and Asp3P relevant for po- exclusively) contributing information which can be overridden on higher levels.

[1]  Hamida Demirdache,et al.  The primitives of temporal relations , 2000 .

[2]  Jerzy Rubach,et al.  Cyclic and Lexical Phonology: The Structure of Polish , 1984 .

[3]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax , 1997 .

[4]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP , 2004 .

[5]  Ken Hale,et al.  8. Notes on World View and Semantic Categories: some Warlpiri Examples , 1986 .

[6]  E. Thompson,et al.  The syntax of tense , 1996 .

[7]  Susan Rothstein.  Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect , 2004 .

[8]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[9]  Jen Hay,et al.  The Non-Uniformity of Degree Achievements , 1998 .

[10]  Charles Edward Townsend.  Russian word-formation , 1968 .

[11]  Marit Julien,et al.  The syntax of complex tenses , 2001 .

[12]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Introducing Arguments , 2002 .

[13]  Olga Borik,et al.  Aspect and reference time , 2002 .

[14]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  From Event Structure to Scale Structure: Degree Modification in Deverbal Adjectives , 1999 .

[15]  Peter Lasersohn.  Plurality, Conjunction and Events , 1994 .

[16]  David R. Dowty.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in M , 1979 .

[17]  Anna Młynarczyk,et al.  Aspectual Pairing in Polish , 2004 .

[18]  Beth Levin,et al.  Telicity Corresponds to Degree of Change , 2002 .

[19]  G. Carlson,et al.  Distributivity Strengthens Reciprocity, Collectivity Weakens It , 2001 .

[20]  Pier Marco Bertinetto,et al.  An attempt at defining the class of gradual completion verbs , 1995 .

[21]  Hans Kamp,et al.  Some remarks on the logic of change, Part I , 1980 .

[22]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[23]  B. Levin,et al.  Scalar Structure Underlies Telicity in "Degree Achievements" , 1999 .