Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition.

Strings of 4 unrelated letters were backward masked at varying durations to examine 3 major issues. (a) One issue concerned relational features. Letters with abnormal relations but normal elements were created by interchanging elements between large and small normal letters. Overall accuracy was higher for letters with normal relations, consistent with the idea that relational features are important in recognition. (b) Interpattern relations were examined by mixing large and small letters within strings. Relative to pure strings, accuracy was reduced, but only for small letters and only when in mixed strings. This effect can be attributed to attentional priority for larger forms over smaller forms, which also explains global precedence with hierarchical forms. (c) Forced-choice alternatives were manipulated in Experiments 2 and 3 to test feature integration theory. Relational information was found to be processed at least as early as feature presence or absence.

[1]  T. Sanocki Perception : Font-Specific , Schematic Tuning , 2011 .

[2]  Jeff Miller Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[3]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .

[4]  George Wolford,et al.  Lateral masking in visual information processing , 1974 .

[5]  L C Boer,et al.  Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  David Navon,et al.  The forest revisited: More on global precedence , 1981 .

[8]  H. Bouma Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. , 1971, Vision research.

[9]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[10]  S. Palmer Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  W. K. Estes,et al.  PERCEPTUAL PROCESSING IN LETTER RECOGNITION AND READING , 1978 .

[12]  Gregory B. Simpson,et al.  Understanding word and sentence , 1991 .

[13]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Emergent features, attention, and object perception. , 1984 .

[14]  Maryanne Martin Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[15]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[16]  J. Rueckl,et al.  Making sentences make sense, or words to that effect , 1991 .

[17]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J T Townsend,et al.  Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  G. Keren,et al.  Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  James T. Townsend Some characteristics of visual whole report behavior , 1981 .

[23]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[24]  J. R. Pomerantz Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. , 1988 .

[26]  L. M. Ward On processing dominance: Comment on Pomerantz. , 1983 .

[27]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  G C Oden,et al.  A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Font Regularity Constraints on the Process of Letter Recognition , 1988 .

[31]  Alexander I. Rudnicky,et al.  Size and case of type as stimuli in reading. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[33]  R Kimchi,et al.  Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Visual Features, Preperceptual Storage, and Processing Time in Reading , 1975 .

[35]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  G. Logan Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.