Gene name ambiguity of eukaryotic nomenclatures

MOTIVATION With more and more scientific literature published online, the effective management and reuse of this knowledge has become problematic. Natural language processing (NLP) may be a potential solution by extracting, structuring and organizing biomedical information in online literature in a timely manner. One essential task is to recognize and identify genomic entities in text. 'Recognition' can be accomplished using pattern matching and machine learning. But for 'identification' these techniques are not adequate. In order to identify genomic entities, NLP needs a comprehensive resource that specifies and classifies genomic entities as they occur in text and that associates them with normalized terms and also unique identifiers so that the extracted entities are well defined. Online organism databases are an excellent resource to create such a lexical resource. However, gene name ambiguity is a serious problem because it affects the appropriate identification of gene entities. In this paper, we explore the extent of the problem and suggest ways to address it. RESULTS We obtained gene information from 21 organisms and quantified naming ambiguities within species, across species, with English words and with medical terms. When the case (of letters) was retained, official symbols displayed negligible intra-species ambiguity (0.02%) and modest ambiguities with general English words (0.57%) and medical terms (1.01%). In contrast, the across-species ambiguity was high (14.20%). The inclusion of gene synonyms increased intra-species ambiguity substantially and full names contributed greatly to gene-medical-term ambiguity. A comprehensive lexical resource that covers gene information for the 21 organisms was then created and used to identify gene names by using a straightforward string matching program to process 45,000 abstracts associated with the mouse model organism while ignoring case and gene names that were also English words. We found that 85.1% of correctly retrieved mouse genes were ambiguous with other gene names. When gene names that were also English words were included, 233% additional 'gene' instances were retrieved, most of which were false positives. We also found that authors prefer to use synonyms (74.7%) to official symbols (17.7%) or full names (7.6%) in their publications. CONTACT lifeng.chen@dbmi.columbia.edu

[1]  Carol Friedman,et al.  Research Paper: A General Natural-language Text Processor for Clinical Radiology , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Proux,et al.  Detecting Gene Symbols and Names in Biological Texts: A First Step toward Pertinent Information Extraction. , 1998, Genome informatics. Workshop on Genome Informatics.

[3]  Staal A. Vinterbo,et al.  A set-covering approach to specific search for literature about human genes , 2000, AMIA.

[4]  Mathew W. Wright,et al.  Guidelines for human gene nomenclature. , 2002, Genomics.

[5]  S Povey,et al.  Guidelines for human gene nomenclature (1997). HUGO Nomenclature Committee. , 1997, Genomics.

[6]  R G Steen,et al.  A high-density integrated genetic linkage and radiation hybrid map of the laboratory rat. , 1999, Genome research.

[7]  Peter J. Haug,et al.  MPLUS: a probabilistic medical language understanding system , 2002, ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain.

[8]  T. Takagi,et al.  Toward information extraction: identifying protein names from biological papers. , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[9]  Merete Fredholm,et al.  DogMap: an international collaboration toward a low-resolution canine genetic marker map. DogMap Consortium. , 1999, The Journal of heredity.

[10]  Alexander A. Morgan,et al.  Rutabaga by any other name: extracting biological names , 2002, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  T. Jenssen,et al.  A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Limsoon Wong,et al.  Accomplishments and challenges in literature data mining for biology , 2002, Bioinform..

[13]  D. Lindberg,et al.  The Unified Medical Language System , 1993, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[14]  Hongfang Liu,et al.  Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 9:238-249(2004) BIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURES: A SOURCE OF LEXICAL KNOWLEDGE AND AMBIGUITY , 2022 .

[15]  Kimberly Van Auken,et al.  WormBase: a multi-species resource for nematode biology and genomics , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  L. Tick,et al.  Medical Language Processing: Applications to Patient Data Representation and Automatic Encoding , 1995, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[17]  W. Gelbart.  The FlyBase database of the Drosophila genome projects and community literature. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  The Zebrafish Information Network (ZFIN): a resource for genetic, genomic and developmental research , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Yuji Matsumoto,et al.  Protein Name Tagging for Biomedical Annotation in Text , 2003, BioNLP@ACL.

[20]  Michael Krauthammer,et al.  GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles , 2001, ISMB.

[21]  Hongfang Liu,et al.  A study of abbreviations in the UMLS , 2001, AMIA.

[22]  Jian Su,et al.  Effective Adaptation of Hidden Markov Model-based Named Entity Recognizer for Biomedical Domain , 2003, BioNLP@ACL.

[23]  Donna R. Maglott,et al.  RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  David Botstein,et al.  SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Daniel Hanisch,et al.  : identifying , 2022 .

[26]  Sue Povey,et al.  Genew: the Human Gene Nomenclature Database , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Jian Hu,et al.  The ARKdb: genome databases for farmed and other animals , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  K. E. Ravikumar,et al.  A Biological Named Entity Recognizer , 2002, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[29]  A. J. Schroeder,et al.  The FlyBase database of the Drosophila Genome Projects and community literature. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  Judith A. Blake,et al.  MGD: the Mouse Genome Database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  Hongfang Liu,et al.  A Study of Text Categorization for Model Organism Databases , 2004, HLT-NAACL 2004.