The Effect of Partitions on Controlling Consumption

The authors demonstrate that partitioning an aggregate quantity of a resource (e.g., food, money) into smaller units reduces the consumed quantity or the rate of consumption of that resource. Partitions draw attention to the consumption decision by introducing a small transaction cost; that is, they provide more decision-making opportunities so that prudent consumers can control consumption. Thus, people are better able to constrain consumption when resources associated with a desirable activity (which they are trying to control) are partitioned rather than when they are aggregated. This effect of partitioning is demonstrated for the consumption of chocolates (Study 1) and gambles (Study 2). In Study 3, process measures reveal that partitioning increases recall accuracy and decision times. Importantly, the effect of partitioning diminishes when consumers are not trying to regulate consumption (Studies 1 and 3). Finally, Study 4 explores how habituation may decrease the amount of attention that partitions draw to consumption. In this context, partitions control consumption to a greater extent when the nature of partitions changes frequently.

[1]  Amar Cheema,et al.  Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions , 2006 .

[2]  R. Thaler,et al.  An Economic Theory of Self-Control , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Ayelet Fishbach,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Self-Control A Function of Knowing When and How to Exercise Restraint , 2022 .

[4]  R. Hastie Problems for judgment and decision making. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  R. Thaler,et al.  An Economic Theory of Self-Control , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  R. Frost,et al.  Cognitions in Compulsive Buying and Acquisition , 2004, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[7]  R. M. Tobin,et al.  Delay of Gratification , 2010 .

[8]  Jean Tirole,et al.  Willpower and Personal Rules , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Ted O’Donoghue,et al.  Doing It Now or Later , 1999 .

[10]  David I. Gilliland,et al.  The infomercial shopper , 1996 .

[11]  Scott A. Neslin,et al.  The Effect of Promotion on Consumption: Buying More and Consuming it Faster , 1998 .

[12]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Shopping Momentum Effect , 2007 .

[13]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[14]  G. Ainslie A Research-based Theory of Addictive Motivation , 2000 .

[15]  Cynthia Barnhart,et al.  Consumption Self-Control by Rationing Purchase Quantities of Virtue and Vice , 1998 .

[16]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[17]  A. Tesser,et al.  The "What the Hell" Effect: Some Effects of Goal Proximity and Goal Framing on Performance , 1996 .

[18]  C. Francis Don't Eat This Book: Fast Food and the Supersizing of America , 2007 .

[19]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind , 1987 .

[20]  R. Baumeister Yielding to Temptation: Self‐Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior , 2002 .

[21]  W. Mischel,et al.  Delay of gratification in children. , 1989, Science.

[22]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[23]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Amar Cheema,et al.  When Goals Are Counterproductive: The Effects of Violation of a Behavioral Goal on Subsequent Performance , 2004 .

[25]  R. D. Manning Credit Card Nation The Consequences Of America's Addiction To Credit , 2000 .