Application of the diffusion-collision model to the folding of three-helix bundle proteins.

The diffusion-collision model has been successful in explaining many features of protein folding kinetics, particularly for helical proteins. In the model the folding reaction is described in terms of coupled chemical kinetic (Master) equations of coarse grained entities, called microdomains. Here, the diffusion-collision model is applied to compute the folding kinetics of four three-helix bundle proteins, all of which fold on a time scale of tens of microseconds and appear to have two-state folding. The native structure and the stability of the helical microdomains are used to determine the parameters of the model. The formulation allows computation of the overall rate and determination of the importance of kinetic intermediates. The proteins considered are the B domain of protein A (1BDC), the Engrailed Homeodomain (1ENH), the peripheral sub-unit-binding domain (1EBD C-chain) and the villin headpiece subdomain (1VII). The results for the folding time of protein A, the Engrailed Homeodomain, and 1EBD C-chain are in agreement with experiment, while 1VII is not stable in the present model. In the three proteins that are stable, two-state folding is predicted by the diffusion-collision model. This disagrees with published assertions that multistate kinetics would be obtained from the model. The contact order prediction agrees with experiment for protein A, but yields values that are a factor of 40, 30 and 15 too slow for 1ENH, 1EBD C-chain and 1VII. The effect of mutants on folding is described for protein A and it is demonstrated that significant intermediate concentrations (i.e. deviation from two-state folding) can occur if the stability of some of the helical microdomains is increased. A linear relationship between folding time and the length of the loop between helices B and C in protein A is demonstrated; this is not evident in the contact order description.

[1]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Helix−Coil Kinetics: Folding Time Scales for Helical Peptides from a Sequential Kinetic Model , 1996 .

[2]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  M. Karplus,et al.  Protein-folding dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[4]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Diffusion‐collision model for the folding kinetics of myoglobin , 1988, Proteins.

[5]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein folding and unfolding in microseconds to nanoseconds by experiment and simulation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Folding dynamics and mechanism of β-hairpin formation , 1997, Nature.

[7]  I. Shimada,et al.  Three-dimensional solution structure of the B domain of staphylococcal protein A: comparisons of the solution and crystal structures. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[8]  Donald Bashford,et al.  Diffusion-Collision Model for the Folding Kinetics of the λ-Repressor Operator-Binding Domain , 1984 .

[9]  P E Wright,et al.  Formation of a molten globule intermediate early in the kinetic folding pathway of apomyoglobin. , 1993, Science.

[10]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  M. Karplus,et al.  Folding of a model three-helix bundle protein: a thermodynamic and kinetic analysis. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters. II. Helix macrodipole effects and rational modification of the helical content of natural peptides. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  S. Jackson,et al.  How do small single-domain proteins fold? , 1998, Folding & design.

[14]  S. Radford,et al.  Protein folding mechanisms: new methods and emerging ideas. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[15]  Terrence G. Oas,et al.  Preorganized secondary structure as an important determinant of fast protein folding , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[16]  M Karplus,et al.  Protein folding dynamics: The diffusion‐collision model and experimental data , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  T. Oas,et al.  Protein folding dynamics: quantitative comparison between theory and experiment. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[18]  M Karplus,et al.  The fundamentals of protein folding: bringing together theory and experiment. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Characterization of the folding kinetics of a three-helix bundle protein via a minimalist Langevin model. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  P. Kollman,et al.  Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. , 1998, Science.

[21]  S. Radford,et al.  Rapid folding with and without populated intermediates in the homologous four-helix proteins Im7 and Im9. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  M. Karplus,et al.  Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins , 1999, Nature.

[23]  L Serrano,et al.  Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters. III. Temperature and pH dependence. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  V. Daggett,et al.  Staphylococcal protein A: unfolding pathways, unfolded states, and differences between the B and E domains. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Aaron R. Dinner,et al.  The roles of stability and contact order in determining protein folding rates , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[26]  E. Shakhnovich.  Theoretical studies of protein-folding thermodynamics and kinetics. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[27]  R. Pappu,et al.  The early folding kinetics of apomyoglobin , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[29]  M. Karplus,et al.  Protein Folding: A Perspective from Theory and Experiment. , 1998, Angewandte Chemie.

[30]  B. Honig.  Protein folding: from the levinthal paradox to structure prediction. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Frederic M. Richards,et al.  Packing of α-helices: Geometrical constraints and contact areas☆ , 1978 .

[32]  D. Baker,et al.  Matching theory and experiment in protein folding. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[33]  M. Marahiel,et al.  Extremely rapid protein folding in the absence of intermediates , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[34]  L. Regan,et al.  Using loop length variants to dissect the folding pathway of a four-helix-bundle protein. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  The folding thermodynamics and kinetics of crambin using an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  G. Rose,et al.  Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[37]  D Baker,et al.  Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[38]  A. Sali.  100,000 protein structures for the biologist , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[39]  L Serrano,et al.  Development of the multiple sequence approximation within the AGADIR model of alpha-helix formation: comparison with Zimm-Bragg and Lifson-Roig formalisms. , 1997, Biopolymers.

[40]  Sheena E. Radford,et al.  Ultrarapid mixing experiments reveal that Im7 folds via an on-pathway intermediate , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[41]  C. Chothia,et al.  Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins , 1974, Nature.

[42]  H. Dyson,et al.  Absence of a stable intermediate on the folding pathway of protein A , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[43]  P S Kim,et al.  A thermostable 35-residue subdomain within villin headpiece. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  D L Weaver,et al.  De novo design and structural characterization of an alpha-helical hairpin peptide: a model system for the study of protein folding intermediates. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  J. Osterhout,et al.  Strategies and rationales for the de novo design of a helical hairpin peptide , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[46]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Conformational analysis of peptide fragments derived from the peripheral subunit-binding domain from the pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex of Bacillus stearothermophilus: evidence for nonrandom structure in the unfolded state. , 1999, Biopolymers.

[47]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Submillisecond folding of the peripheral subunit-binding domain. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  M R Lee,et al.  Use of MM‐PB/SA in estimating the free energies of proteins: Application to native, intermediates, and unfolded villin headpiece , 2000, Proteins.

[49]  L. Serrano,et al.  Loop length, intramolecular diffusion and protein folding , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[50]  M. Karplus,et al.  Diffusion–collision model for protein folding , 1979 .

[51]  G. Rose,et al.  Is protein folding hierarchic? II. Folding intermediates and transition states. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[52]  C. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the folding free energy surface of a three-helix bundle protein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.