Cellular Cardiomyoplasty Improves Survival After Myocardial Injury

Background—Cellular cardiomyoplasty is discussed as an alternative therapeutic approach to heart failure. To date, however, the functional characteristics of the transplanted cells, their contribution to heart function, and most importantly, the potential therapeutic benefit of this treatment remain unclear. Methods and Results—Murine ventricular cardiomyocytes (E12.5–E15.5) labeled with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were transplanted into the cryoinjured left ventricular walls of 2-month-old male mice. Ultrastructural analysis of the cryoinfarction showed a complete loss of cardiomyocytes within 2 days and fibrotic healing within 7 days after injury. Two weeks after operation, EGFP-positive cardiomyocytes were engrafted throughout the wall of the lesioned myocardium. Morphological studies showed differentiation and formation of intercellular contacts. Furthermore, electrophysiological experiments on isolated EGFP-positive cardiomyocytes showed time-dependent differentiation with postnatal ventricular action potentials and intact &bgr;-adrenergic modulation. These findings were corroborated by Western blotting, in which accelerated differentiation of the transplanted cells was detected on the basis of a switch in troponin I isoforms. When contractility was tested in muscle strips and heart function was assessed by use of echocardiography, a significant improvement of force generation and heart function was seen. These findings were supported by a clear improvement of survival of mice in the cardiomyoplasty group when a large group of animals was analyzed (n=153). Conclusions—Transplanted embryonic cardiomyocytes engraft and display accelerated differentiation and intact cellular excitability. The present study demonstrates, as a proof of principle, that cellular cardiomyoplasty improves heart function and increases survival on myocardial injury.

[1]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Regenerating functional myocardium: Improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[2]  David M. Bodine,et al.  Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium , 2001, Nature.

[3]  C. Murry,et al.  Electromechanical coupling between skeletal and cardiac muscle. Implications for infarct repair. , 2000 .

[4]  B. Fleischmann,et al.  Cellular cardiomyoplasty in a transgenic mouse model. , 2002, Transplantation.

[5]  B. Fleischmann,et al.  Functional Characteristics of ES Cell–derived Cardiac Precursor Cells Identified by Tissue-specific Expression of the Green Fluorescent Protein , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  S. Schiaffino,et al.  Troponin I switching in the developing heart. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[7]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Comparison of Benefits on Myocardial Performance of Cellular Cardiomyoplasty with Skeletal Myoblasts and Fibroblasts , 2000, Cell transplantation.

[8]  D. Sawyer,et al.  Cell Therapy Attenuates Deleterious Ventricular Remodeling and Improves Cardiac Performance After Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Circulation.

[9]  G. Koh,et al.  Genetically selected cardiomyocytes from differentiating embronic stem cells form stable intracardiac grafts. , 1996, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  O. Carretero,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function in conscious and anesthetized mice. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[11]  B. Brenner,et al.  Cross-bridge attachment during high-speed active shortening of skinned fibers of the rabbit psoas muscle: implications for cross-bridge action during maximum velocity of filament sliding. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Federica Limana,et al.  Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. Shum-Tim,et al.  Marrow stromal cells for cellular cardiomyoplasty: feasibility and potential clinical advantages. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  R. Timpl,et al.  The angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin impairs blood vessel maturation during wound healing , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[15]  A. Hagège,et al.  Myoblast transplantation for heart failure , 2001, The Lancet.

[16]  LeslieReinlib,et al.  Cell Transplantation as Future Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease , 2000 .

[17]  R. Weisel,et al.  Fetal cell transplantation: a comparison of three cell types. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  B. Fleischmann,et al.  Outwards currents in embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes , 2000, Pflügers Archiv.

[19]  K. W. Linz,et al.  Profile and kinetics of L-type calcium current during the cardiac ventricular action potential compared in guinea-pigs, rats and rabbits , 2000, Pflügers Archiv.

[20]  C. Andressen,et al.  Cardiac specific expression of the green fluorescent protein during early murine embryonic development , 1998, FEBS letters.

[21]  S M Schwartz,et al.  Skeletal myoblast transplantation for repair of myocardial necrosis. , 1996, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  A. Hagège,et al.  Comparison of the effects of fetal cardiomyocyte and skeletal myoblast transplantation on postinfarction left ventricular function. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  C. Murry,et al.  Survival, integration, and differentiation of cardiomyocyte grafts: a study in normal and injured rat hearts. , 1999, Circulation.

[24]  Catherine M. Otto,et al.  Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography , 2004 .