HE ultimate goal of research on T shelter from the wind is to delineate the most effective windbreaks and to predict their effects on crop yields, soil stabilization, and evaporation. Baltaxe (1)’ suggested that the first step toward this goal should be to link the windbreak characteristics with the nature of the leeward airflow. Many researchers (6, 14, 15, 16) have studied windbreak windspeed reduction and made many differing assertions on how far leeward windspeed reduction extends. Most of them noted, however, that porosity is the major factor determining a windbreak‘s ability to reduce windspeed. Mean vertical flow and turbulent fluctuations have not been studied extensively in relation to windbreak porosity (5, 15). Assuming that airflow over a windbreak is incompressible (Le., Reynolds number less than lOG), the continuity equation for steady flow indicates that a mean vertical flow exists in the lee of windbreaks. One consequence of a mean vertical flow can be demonstrated by considering a property, the measure per unit mass of which is s and the vertical transport of which can be described by thk equation: pws = (pw)s + (pw)’s’ ........ where p is air density, w is vertical velocity (the primes denoting instantaneous departures from the mean and the bar indicating a time average (13)). At low heights above uniform terrain, pw is usually zero and equation [ l ] represents the flux due to eddy motion alone. Leeward of a windbreak pW is not likely to be zero, however; and if it is large, PW should influence the microclimate. Turbulent velocity fluctuations are important in the vertical transport process, as shown in equation [ 11. Both the magnitude and spectral distribution 6f turbulent velocity fluctuations have been studied extensively in the open field (2, 4, 10, 11, 12). Knowledge is limited on how windbreak L. J. Hagen and E. L. Skidmore Assoc. MEMRFR ASAE
[1]
N. P. Woodruff.
Influence of a field windbreak on summer wind movement and air temperature.
,
1959
.
[2]
M. Karon,et al.
Hygroscopic equilibrium of peanuts
,
1949
.
[3]
James H. Young,et al.
Simultaneous Heat and Mass Transfer in a Porous, Hygroscopic Solid
,
1969
.
[4]
H. L. Penman.
Evaporation in nature
,
1947
.
[5]
L. J. Hagen,et al.
Evaporation in sheltered areas as influenced by windbreak porosity.
,
1970
.
[6]
S. Berman,et al.
Estimating the longitudinal wind spectrum near the ground
,
1965
.
[7]
Charles Henry Brian Priestley,et al.
Turbulent Transfer in the Lower Atmosphere
,
1959
.
[8]
A. S. Monin,et al.
The Structure of Atmospheric Turbulence
,
1958
.
[9]
J. G. Porterfield,et al.
Specific Heat of Spanish Peanuts
,
1970
.
[10]
R. Baltaxe,et al.
Air flow patterns in the lee of model windbreaks
,
1967
.
[11]
J. G. Porterfield,et al.
Moisture Movement in a Porous, Hygroscopic Solid
,
1968
.
[12]
K. Brown.
Mechanisms of windbreak influence on microclimate, evapotranspiration and photosynthesis of the sheltered crop.
,
1969
.
[13]
R. E. Hetzler,et al.
Cup Anemometer Behavior with Respect to Attack Angle Variation of the Relative Wind
,
1967
.
[14]
John L. Lumley,et al.
The structure of atmospheric turbulence
,
1964
.