Health literacy and patient information: developing the methodology for a national evidence-based health website.

[1]  G. Harry McLaughlin.  Temptations of the flesch , 1974 .

[2]  D. Nutbeam,et al.  Health promotion glossary (1998) , 1998 .

[3]  Don Nutbeam,et al.  Health promotion glossary. , 1986, Health promotion.

[4]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Agreement among reviewers of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  A Coulter,et al.  Evidence based patient information , 1998, BMJ.

[7]  T A Sheldon,et al.  Evidence-Informed Patient Choice: Practical Issues of Involving Patients in Decisions About Health Care Technologies , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  D. Nutbeam.  Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century , 2000 .

[9]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Database of patients' experiences (DIPEx): a multi-media approach to sharing experiences and information , 2000, The Lancet.

[10]  M Dixon-Woods,et al.  Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[11]  I. Kickbusch,et al.  Health literacy: addressing the health and education divide. , 2001, Health promotion international.

[12]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  Use of the Internet by Patients Before and After Cardiac Surgery: An Interdisciplinary Telephone Survey , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  G. Ollenschläger,et al.  [Well-informed on health matters--how well? The German 'Clearinghouse for Patient Information'--objective, background and methods]. , 2002, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[14]  Gut informiert über Gesundheitsfragen, aber wie? , 2002 .

[15]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[16]  Jane Ogden,et al.  What's in a name? An experimental study of patients' views of the impact and function of a diagnosis. , 2003, Family practice.

[17]  A. Kazanjian,et al.  Informing, advising, or persuading? An assessment of bone mineral density testing information from consumer health websites , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[18]  Graciela Rosemblat,et al.  Assessing Readability of Consumer Health Information: An Exploratory Study , 2004, MedInfo.

[19]  Ronald M Epstein,et al.  Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. , 2004, JAMA.

[20]  I. Mühlhauser,et al.  Risk information – barrier to informed choice? A focus group study , 2004, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin/Social and Preventive Medicine.

[21]  Daniela B Friedman,et al.  Readability of cancer information on the internet. , 2004, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[22]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care , 2005, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[23]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[24]  Phyllis Butow,et al.  A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence. , 2006, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[25]  T. Kettunen,et al.  Developing empowering health counseling measurement. Preliminary results. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[26]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness) , 2006, Medical education.

[27]  Daniela B. Friedman,et al.  A Systematic Review of Readability and Comprehension Instruments Used for Print and Web-Based Cancer Information , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[28]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Lay perceptions of evidence-based information – a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[29]  Kathleen N. Lohr,et al.  Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[30]  I. Mühlhauser,et al.  Selective information seeking: can consumers' avoidance of evidence-based information on colorectal cancer screening be explained by the theory of cognitive dissonance? , 2007, German medical science : GMS e-journal.

[31]  I. Lipkus.  Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[32]  D. Friedman,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Older Adults' Comprehension of Printed Cancer Information: Is Readability a Key Factor? , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[33]  S. Salanterä,et al.  Empowering discourse in patient education. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[34]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[35]  I. Mühlhauser,et al.  How to measure critical health competences: development and validation of the Critical Health Competence Test (CHC Test) , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[36]  D. Sackett.  Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 2018 .