Heterodyne displacement interferometer, insensitive for input polarization.

Periodic nonlinearity (PNL) in displacement interferometers is a systematic error source that limits measurement accuracy. The PNL of coaxial heterodyne interferometers is highly influenced by the polarization state and orientation of the source frequencies. In this Letter, we investigate this error source and discuss two interferometer designs, designed at TU Delft, that showed very low levels of PNL when subjected to any polarization state and/or polarization orientation. In the experiments, quarter-wave plates (qwps) and half-wave plates (hwps) were used to manipulate the polarization state and polarization orientation, respectively. Results from a commercial coaxial system showed first-order PNL exceeding 10 nm (together with higher order PNL) when the system ceased operation at around ±15°  hwp rotation or ±20°  qwp rotation. The two "Delft interferometers," however, continued operation beyond these maxima and obtained first-order PNLs in the order of several picometers, without showing higher order PNLs. The major advantage of these interferometers, beside their high linearity, is that they can be fully fiber coupled and thus allow for a modular system buildup.

[1]  Birk Andreas,et al.  A heterodyne interferometer with periodic nonlinearities smaller than ±10 pm , 2012 .

[2]  J. Lawall,et al.  Heterodyne interferometer with subatomic periodic nonlinearity. , 1999, Applied optics.

[3]  J. Lawall,et al.  Michelson Interferometry With 10 PM Accuracy , 2000 .

[4]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  First-order periodic error correction: validation for constant and non-constant velocities with variable error magnitudes , 2006 .

[5]  V. Badami,et al.  A frequency domain method for the measurement of nonlinearity in heterodyne interferometry , 2000 .

[6]  G. M. Harry,et al.  Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors , 2010 .

[7]  C. Wagner,et al.  EUV lithography: Lithography gets extreme , 2010 .

[8]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Modeling and verifying non-linearities in heterodyne displacement interferometry , 2002 .

[9]  T. Hänsch,et al.  Optical frequency metrology , 2002, Nature.

[10]  C M Sutton.  Non-linearity in length measurement using heterodyne laser Michelson interferometry , 1987 .

[11]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Linear interpolation of periodic error in a heterodyne laser interferometer at subnanometer levels (dimension measurement) , 1989 .

[12]  Wenmei Hou.  Optical parts and the nonlinearity in heterodyne interferometers , 2006 .

[13]  Jonathan D Ellis,et al.  Fiber-coupled displacement interferometry without periodic nonlinearity. , 2011, Optics letters.

[14]  Ki-Nam Joo,et al.  Simple heterodyne laser interferometer with subnanometer periodic errors. , 2009, Optics letters.

[15]  Dirk Voigt,et al.  Relative optical wavefront measurement in displacement measuring interferometer systems with sub-nm precision. , 2013, Optics express.

[16]  R. Deslattes,et al.  Analytical modeling of the periodic nonlinearity in heterodyne interferometry. , 1998, Applied optics.

[17]  Low velocity compensation for first order periodic error caused by beam shear , 2011 .

[18]  Ki-Nam Joo,et al.  High resolution heterodyne interferometer without detectable periodic nonlinearity. , 2010, Optics express.

[19]  G. V. Fedotova.  Analysis of the measurement error of the parameters of mechanical vibrations , 1980 .

[20]  Wenmei Hou,et al.  Investigation and compensation of the nonlinearity of heterodyne interferometers , 1992 .

[21]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Acousto-optic displacement-measuring interferometer: a new heterodyne interferometer with Ångstrom-level periodic error , 2002 .

[22]  Chien-ming Wu.  Periodic nonlinearity resulting from ghost reflections in heterodyne interferometry , 2003 .