New method for benchmarking traffic safety level for the territory

Evaluation, monitoring and comparison of traffic safety in various territories presents a major challenge to the traffic safety researches. Recently a large number of studies are focused on finding an appropriate method for the calculation of the traffic safety level which uses a single numerical value for its assessment. For that purpose, traffic safety indicators are combined into a single numerical value by appropriate techniques in order to represent a grade of the traffic safety level. This paper contains, after the summary of contemporary tendencies in the evaluation of traffic safety levels, the analysis of methods used in the evaluation of traffic safety levels so far in Serbia with the emphasis on their values and deficiencies. Considering those analyses, this paper introduces a new method for traffic safety level evaluation the so called Benchmarked Traffic Safety Level (BTSL). BTSL implies selection of appropriate indicators, transformation of chosen indicators, assigning weights and aggregation. The proposed scale appliance enables traffic safety level to define for the territory, and also compares it with a similar one. BTSL provides a single numerical value so that to evaluate the traffic safety level for the territory, derived from the aggregation of previously transformed and 'weighted' three outcomes indicators and three safety performance indicators.

[1]  Fred Wegman,et al.  Development of Footprint Methodology for Road Safety , 2007 .

[2]  W. Haddon A logical framework for categorizing highway safety phenomena and activity. , 1972, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  Geert Wets,et al.  Combining road safety information in a performance index. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Tami Toroyan,et al.  Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for Action , 2009 .

[5]  Geert Wets,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of the road safety index , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Geert Wets,et al.  Benchmarking road safety: lessons to learn from a data envelopment analysis. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  John Peter Rothe Beyond Traffic Safety , 1994 .

[8]  K. Diamandouros,et al.  European Road Statistics 2010 , 2010 .

[9]  Thomas L Traynor,et al.  The impact of state level behavioral regulations on traffic fatality rates. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[10]  Massachusetts. Parole Board. Annual Statistical Report (2008) , 2007 .

[11]  Fred Wegman,et al.  Benchmarking Road Safety Performances of Countries , 2010 .

[12]  Victoria Gitelman,et al.  Designing a composite indicator for road safety. , 2010 .

[13]  Han Bai,et al.  Traffic Safety Performance Assessment and Multivariate Treatments for Intersection Locations , 2011 .

[14]  South Dakota,et al.  ANNUAL STATISTICAL REPORT , 2013 .

[15]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Road safety in China: analysis of current challenges. , 2010, Journal of safety research.

[16]  Ghazwan Al-Haji,et al.  Road Safety Development Index Theory, Philosophy and Practice , 2007 .

[17]  Kenneth Wade Ogden,et al.  Safer Roads: A Guide to Road Safety Engineering , 1995 .