A comparison of kinematic-based gait event detection methods in a self-paced treadmill application.

Kinematic-based algorithms for detecting gait events are efficient and useful in the absence of (reliable) kinetic data. However, the validity of these kinematic-based algorithms for self-paced treadmill walking is unknown, particularly given the influence of walking speed on such data. We quantified offsets in event detection of four foot kinematics-based algorithms (horizontal position, horizontal velocity, vertical velocity, and sagittal resultant velocity) relative to events determined by a threshold in vertical ground reaction force among seven uninjured individuals - and nine with unilateral transtibial amputation - walking on a self-paced treadmill. Across walking speeds from 0.48-1.64m/s (0.5-31.7% CV), offsets ranged from -7 to +3 frames (≈83.3ms) in heel strike, and -3 to +5 frames (≈66.6 ms) in toe off. Regardless of method, offsets in heel strike were not influenced (-0.010.61) by variability in walking speed. However, offsets in toe-off were positively correlated with variability in walking speed for the horizontal position (r=0.539; P<0.001) and velocity (r=0.463; P<0.001) algorithms, and negatively correlated (r=-0.317; P<0.001) for the vertical velocity algorithm; offsets from the sagittal resultant velocity algorithm, with thresholds adjusted for walking speed, were not strongly associated (r=0.126; P=0.27). Although relatively minimal offsets support the applicability of these algorithms to self-paced walking, for individuals with asymptomatic and pathological gait patterns, sagittal resultant velocity of the foot produces the most consistent event detection over the widest range of (and variability in) walking speeds.

[1]  Dustin A. Bruening,et al.  Automated event detection algorithms in pathological gait. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[2]  Edward D Lemaire,et al.  Fixed and self-paced treadmill walking for able-bodied and transtibial amputees in a multi-terrain virtual environment. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[3]  Jin-Seung Choi,et al.  Reliability of the walking speed and gait dynamics variables while walking on a feedback-controlled treadmill. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  F. Alton,et al.  A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  W. A. Sparrow,et al.  Identifying Heel Contact and Toe-Off Using Forceplate Thresholds with a Range of Digital-Filter Cutoff Frequencies , 2003 .

[6]  Salim Ghoussayni,et al.  Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[7]  Steven Morrison,et al.  Agreement between footswitch and ground reaction force techniques for identifying gait events: inter-session repeatability and the effect of walking speed. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[8]  J. Harlaar,et al.  Self-paced versus fixed speed treadmill walking. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[9]  Ciara M O'Connor,et al.  Automatic detection of gait events using kinematic data. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[10]  J S Higginson,et al.  Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[11]  R. Kiss.  Comparison between kinematic and ground reaction force techniques for determining gait events during treadmill walking at different walking speeds. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  E. Ayyappa,et al.  Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Spatiotemporal gait deviations in a virtual reality environment. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[14]  Jill S Higginson,et al.  Gait parameters and stride-to-stride variability during familiarization to walking on a split-belt treadmill. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.