Hazard-Consistent Intensity Measure Conversion of Fragility Curves

The study presented in this article was developed within the activities of the ReLUISDPC 2014-2018 research program, funded by Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri – Dipartimento della Protezione Civil and the Horizon 2020 MSCA-RISE-2015 project No. 691213 entitled "Experimental Computational Hybrid Assessment of Natural Gas Pipelines Exposed to Seismic Risk” (EXCHANGE-RISK).

[1]  H. Crowley,et al.  Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003–2009) for the Italian Building Code , 2011 .

[2]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[3]  J. Baker,et al.  A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon , 2005 .

[4]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[5]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector‐valued intensity measures , 2007 .

[6]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional spectrum‐based ground motion selection. Part I: Hazard consistency for risk‐based assessments , 2013 .

[7]  Donat Fäh,et al.  Deriving fragility functions from bilinearized capacity curves for earthquake scenario modelling using the conditional spectrum , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[8]  Pacific Earthquake.  A Technical Framework for Probability-Based Demand and Capacity Factor Design (DCFD) Seismic Formats , 2003 .

[9]  C. Cornell,et al.  Disaggregation of seismic hazard , 1999 .

[10]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[11]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Seismic Reliability of Code-Conforming Italian Buildings , 2018, Journal of Earthquake Engineering.

[12]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[13]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REASSESS V2.0: software for single- and multi-site probabilistic seismic hazard analysis , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[14]  I. Iervolino,et al.  A LOOK AT THE SEISMIC RISK OF ITALIAN CODE-CONFORMING RC BUILDINGS , 2018 .

[15]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Conditional Hazard Maps for Secondary Intensity Measures , 2010 .

[16]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation of Spectral Acceleration Values from NGA Ground Motion Models , 2008 .

[17]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi‐linear static pushovers through IDA , 2006 .

[18]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Structural Seismic Demand Analysis: Consideration of "Collapse" , 2000 .

[19]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Modeling and Seismic Response Analysis of Italian Code-Conforming Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2018, Journal of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures , 2007 .

[21]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  SPO2FRAG: software for seismic fragility assessment based on static pushover , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[22]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Disaggregation-based response weighting scheme for seismic risk assessment of structures , 2010 .