Evaluation and Selection of HazMat Transportation Alternatives: A PHFLTS- and TOPSIS-Integrated Multi-Perspective Approach

Outsourcing the hazardous materials (HazMat) transportation is an effective way for manufacturing enterprises to avoid risks and accidents as well as to retain sustainable development in economic growth and social inclusion while not bringing negative impacts on the public and the environment. It is imperative to develop viable and effective approaches to selecting the most appropriate HazMat transportation alternatives. This paper aims at proposing an integrated multi-criteria group decision making approach that combines proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (PHFLTS) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to address the problem of HazMat transportation alternative evaluation and selection. PHFLTSs are adopted to represent the congregated individual evaluations in a bid to avoid information loss and increase the reliability of results. Two weight assignment models are then proposed to determine the comprehensive weights of experts and criteria. Furthermore, several novel manipulations of PHFLTS are also defined to enrich its applicability. The TOPSIS method is subsequently extended to the context of PHFLTSs to rank alternatives and choose the best one. Eventually, the feasibility and validity of the proposed approach are verified by a practical case study of a HazMat transportation alternative evaluation and selection decision and further comparison analyses.

[1]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[2]  Bin Shuai,et al.  Revisiting the Role of Hesitant Multiplicative Preference Relations in Group Decision Making With Novel Consistency Improving and Consensus Reaching Processes , 2019, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[3]  A. Saltelli,et al.  On the Relative Importance of Input Factors in Mathematical Models , 2002 .

[4]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  A Cost Consensus Metric for Consensus Reaching Processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  Hesitant L ‐Fuzzy Sets , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[6]  Michael P. Johnson Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda , 2001 .

[7]  Jun Bi,et al.  A survey on hazardous materials accidents during road transport in China from 2000 to 2008. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A preference aggregation method through the estimation of utility intervals , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Luis Martínez,et al.  Customizing Semantics for Individuals With Attitudinal HFLTS Possibility Distributions , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[10]  Yan Sun,et al.  Bi-Objective Modelling for Hazardous Materials Road–Rail Multimodal Routing Problem with Railway Schedule-Based Space–Time Constraints , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[11]  Vedat Verter,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORT RISK ASSESSMENT , 1995 .

[12]  G. Spadoni,et al.  Risk analysis of hazardous materials transportation: evaluating uncertainty by means of fuzzy logic , 1998 .

[13]  Shahaboddin Shamshirband,et al.  Application of ANNs, ANFIS and RSM to estimating and optimizing the parameters that affect the yield and cost of biodiesel production , 2018 .

[14]  K. Chin,et al.  An enhanced ordered weighted averaging operators generation algorithm with applications for multicriteria decision making , 2019, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[15]  Yi Yang,et al.  Generating HFLTS possibility distribution with an embedded assessing attitude , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[16]  Ambisisi Ambituuni,et al.  Risk Assessment of Petroleum Product Transportation by Road: A Framework for Regulatory Improvement , 2015 .

[17]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making based on Bonferroni means with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information , 2016, Soft Computing.

[18]  Hui Yu,et al.  Emergency Alternative Selection Based on an E-IFWA Approach , 2019, IEEE Access.

[19]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Flexible Linguistic Expressions and Consensus Reaching With Accurate Constraints in Group Decision-Making , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[20]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  New approach for quality function deployment based on proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and prospect theory , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[21]  Márcio de Almeida D'Agosto,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria model for evaluating sustainable urban freight transportation operations , 2018 .

[22]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  Sustainable building material selection: A QFD- and ELECTRE III-embedded hybrid MCGDM approach with consensus building , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[23]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[24]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Constructing Novel Operational Laws and Information Measures for Proportional Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets with Extension to PHFL-VIKOR for Group Decision Making , 2019, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[25]  M Sam Mannan,et al.  Utilization of accident databases and fuzzy sets to estimate frequency of HazMat transport accidents. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[26]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral approach , 2018 .

[27]  Yanbing Ju,et al.  A multi-granularity proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic TODIM method and its application to emergency decision making , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[28]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Dangerous good transportation by road: from risk analysis to emergency planning , 2005 .

[29]  Zhiliang Ren,et al.  A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic TODIM Method Based on a Score Function , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[30]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A Novel MAGDM Approach With Proportional Hesitant Fuzzy Sets , 2018, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[31]  Cuiping Wei,et al.  Note on entropies of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[33]  Harish Garg,et al.  A topological structure involving hesitant fuzzy sets , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queuing method for multiple criteria decision making , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  Two-stage aggregation paradigm for HFLTS possibility distributions: A hierarchical clustering perspective , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Christy Mihyeon Jeon,et al.  Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics , 2005 .

[37]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Modeling of energy consumption and environmental life cycle assessment for incineration and landfill systems of municipal solid waste management - A case study in Tehran Metropolis of Iran , 2017 .

[38]  Gagandeep Kaur,et al.  Algorithm for Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Based on Aggregation Operators With New Distance Measures , 2018, Mathematics.

[39]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Identifying passengers’ needs in cabin interiors of high-speed rails in China using quality function deployment for improving passenger satisfaction , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[40]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Missing values estimation and consensus building for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations with multiplicative consistency , 2018, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[41]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Entropy Measures of Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets , 2018, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[42]  B. Farhadinia,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making methods with completely unknown weights in hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setting , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[43]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[44]  K. Chau,et al.  Application of data envelopment analysis approach for optimization of energy use and reduction of greenhouse gas emission in peanut production of Iran , 2018 .

[45]  Zaher Mundher Yaseen,et al.  An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: State-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[46]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A new approach of multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation and selection of sustainable transport investment projects under uncertainty: A case study , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[47]  Gagandeep Kaur,et al.  Extended TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision-making problems under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2018, Scientia Iranica.

[48]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  Generalized distances between rankings , 2010, WWW '10.

[49]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  The 2-tuple Linguistic Model: Computing with Words in Decision Making , 2015 .

[50]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  T. Traas,et al.  Risk management of hazardous substances in a circular economy. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[52]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A decision support model for risk management of hazardous materials road transportation based on quality function deployment , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[53]  Yi Yang,et al.  Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[54]  Gina Galindo,et al.  A review on research in transportation of hazardous materials , 2019, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

[55]  Wann-Ming Wey,et al.  Constructing urban dynamic transportation planning strategies for improving quality of life and urban sustainability under emerging growth management principles , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[56]  Laijun Zhao,et al.  Risk Analysis of Dangerous Chemicals Transportation , 2007 .

[57]  Wai K. Chong,et al.  Evaluation of state sustainable transportation performances (SSTP) using sustainable indicators , 2017 .

[58]  Md. Jalil Piran,et al.  Survey of computational intelligence as basis to big flood management: challenges, research directions and future work , 2018 .

[59]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A dynamic multi-attribute group emergency decision making method considering experts' hesitation , 2018, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[60]  Xulei Wang,et al.  Analysis of Factors that Influence Hazardous Material Transportation Accidents Based on Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in China , 2012 .

[61]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[62]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[63]  Xiang Liu,et al.  Integrated risk reduction framework to improve railway hazardous materials transportation safety. , 2013, Journal of hazardous materials.

[64]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A quality function deployment-based framework for the risk management of hazardous material transportation process , 2018 .

[65]  Xuan Zhang,et al.  Heterogeneous Interrelationships among Attributes in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis , 2019, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[66]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  Emergency Evacuation Plan for Hazardous Chemicals Leakage Accidents Using GIS-based Risk Analysis Techniques in South Korea , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[67]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Minimizing adjusted simple terms in the consensus reaching process with hesitant linguistic assessments in group decision making , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[68]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Overview on Fuzzy Modelling of Complex Linguistic Preferences in Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[69]  Renee M. Clark,et al.  A new approach to hazardous materials transportation risk analysis: decision modeling to identify critical variables. , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[70]  Gloria Bordogna,et al.  A Fuzzy Linguistic Approach Generalizing Boolean Information Retrieval: A Model and Its Evaluation , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[71]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[72]  Yi Yang,et al.  Fostering linguistic decision-making under uncertainty: A proportional interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators and andness optimization models , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[73]  Harish Garg,et al.  A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory , 2018, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[74]  Yanbing Ju,et al.  Emergency alternative evaluation and selection based on ANP, DEMATEL, and TL-TOPSIS , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[75]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Constructing the geometric Bonferroni mean from the generalized Bonferroni mean with several extensions to linguistic 2-tuples for decision-making , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..