Anatomically Adaptive Coils for MRI—A 6-Channel Array for Knee Imaging at 1.5 Tesla

Purpose: Many of today's MR coils are still somehow rigid and inflexible in their size and shape as they are intentionally designed to image a specific anatomical region and to fit a wide range of patients. Adaptive coils on the other hand, are intended to follow a one-size-fits-all approach, by fitting different shapes, and sizes. Such coils improve the SNR for a wide range of subjects by an optimal fit to the anatomical region of interest, and in addition allow an increased handling and patient comfort as one MRI receive-coil is maintained instead of multiple. Material and Methods: To overcome the SNR losses by non-fitting and thus poorly loaded RF coils, we propose a stretchable antenna design. Each loop has the ability to reversibly stretch up to 100% of its original size, to be anatomically adaptive to different shapes and sizes, and therefore make the coil usable for a wide patient population. Besides the mechanical challenge to find a robust but flexible conductive material, various other problems like frequency and matching shifts affect the SNR. Through bench measurements and MR Imaging at 1.5 T, we investigated different stretchable conductor materials, that fit the defined requirements. Finally, a rigid reference coil and an adaptive 6-channel array for knee imaging at 1.5 Tesla were developed to investigate the potential improvement in SNR. Results: The material tests identified two potentially useful materials: Highly ductile copper and a silver-plated stranded copper wire. Although, the adaptivity causes a frequency shift of the resonance frequency, which entails in variations of the impedance that each coil presents to its connected pre-amplifier, there are strategies to mitigate these effects. The adaptive array prototype made of partly-stretchable loops, showed an improved SNR of up to 100% in 20 mm depth from the phantom surface, and therefore demonstrates the effectiveness of adaptive coils.

[1]  S. Wright Receiver Loop Arrays , 2011 .

[2]  Deniz Erdoğmuş,et al.  SNR-optimality of sum-of-squares reconstruction for phased-array magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[3]  Michael Lustig,et al.  Screen-printed flexible MRI receive coils , 2016, Nature Communications.

[4]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance: Why and when? , 2010, World journal of radiology.

[5]  J A Malko,et al.  A flexible mercury-filled surface coil for MR imaging. , 1986, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  Andrew Webb,et al.  Shielded‐coaxial‐cable coils as receive and transceive array elements for 7T human MRI , 2019, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Jiasheng Hong,et al.  Couplings of microstrip square open-loop resonators for cross-coupled planar microwave filters , 1996 .

[8]  E B Boskamp Improved surface coil imaging in MR: decoupling of the excitation and receiver coils. , 1985, Radiology.

[9]  E. Moser,et al.  A flexible 12-channel transceiver array of transmission line resonators for 7 T MRI. , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  A high-impedance detector-array glove for magnetic resonance imaging of the hand , 2018, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Peter Vizmuller,et al.  RF Design Guide Systems, Circuits and Equations , 1995 .

[12]  J. Thomas Vaughan,et al.  Electrically auto-tuned RF coil design , 2010 .

[13]  H. Swartz,et al.  Electronically tunable surface-coil-type resonator for L-band EPR spectroscopy. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[14]  C. Hardy,et al.  32‐element receiver‐coil array for cardiac imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  High-resolution MR imaging with local coils. , 1989, Radiology.

[16]  Steen Moeller,et al.  A geometrically adjustable 16‐channel transmit/receive transmission line array for improved RF efficiency and parallel imaging performance at 7 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  N. De Zanche,et al.  Mechanically adjustable coil array for wrist MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Flexible 23-channel coil array for high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  Christina Triantafyllou,et al.  A 128‐channel receive‐only cardiac coil for highly accelerated cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Lawrence L Wald,et al.  Massively parallel MRI detector arrays. , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[21]  B. Hargreaves,et al.  Automatic tuning of flexible interventional RF receiver coils , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Ultra-High Field NMR and MRI—The Role of Magnet Technology to Increase Sensitivity and Specificity , 2017, Front. Phys..

[23]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  J. Polimeni,et al.  96‐Channel receive‐only head coil for 3 Tesla: Design optimization and evaluation , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  J L Bloem,et al.  Application of anatomically shaped surface coils in MRI at 0.5 T , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Billy Sperlich,et al.  Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training , 2014, Front. Physiol..

[27]  D. Gadian,et al.  Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils , 1980, Nature.

[28]  X Marchandise,et al.  A new, fully versatile surface coil for MRI. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  L. Wald,et al.  32‐channel 3 Tesla receive‐only phased‐array head coil with soccer‐ball element geometry , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.