Improving the Sensitivity of Research Publication Indices Using Exponential Function and the Area under Curve

In collecting and analyzing information about recent research papers, authors, and journals with their citation and indices, we noticed that in many cases such indices fail to reflect reality and are incapable to distinguish between different authors in some cases while they clearly have different research profiles. There are many research papers that can be found in literature that discussed the behavior and limitations of the current citation or publication indices. Most of them referred to the sensitivity problem and the fact that most indices neglect some publications during index calculation. These two problems are the most important limitations that may judge index fairness. In this paper, we proposed new indices; MIExp-Index using exponential function and MIArea-Index using the concept of the area under curve (AUC) in order to enhance the sensitivity and thus the fairness of index assessment. To demonstrate our two novel indices, data of real and hypothetical authors were used to demonstrate these two approaches. The results showed that both of the proposed indices are very sensitive for each single citation that the paper receives after being published. In addition, the two indices consider all authors’ publications, even the new ones, into account.

[1]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index , 2006 .

[2]  M. Kosmulski A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index , 2009 .

[3]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  A cluster analysis of scholar and journal bibliometric indicators , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Probing the h-core: an investigation of the tail–core ratio for rank distributions , 2010, Scientometrics.

[6]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  A case study of the modified g index: Counting multi-author publications fractionally , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Qiang Wu,et al.  The w-index: A measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[9]  R. Rousseau,et al.  The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[10]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  How to modify the g-index for multi-authored manuscripts , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals , 2006, Scientometrics.

[12]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[13]  L. Egghe How to improve the h-index , 2006 .

[14]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[15]  Izzat Alsmadi,et al.  A Survey of Impact and Citation Indices: Limitations and Issues , 2012 .

[16]  M. Schreiber,et al.  Exploratory factor analysis for the Hirsch index, 17 h-type variants, and some traditional bibliometric indicators , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[17]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do we know about the h index? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Bihui Jin The AR-index: complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[21]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[22]  L. Egghe An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .

[23]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices , 2010, Scientometrics.

[24]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[26]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact , 2006, Scientometrics.

[27]  Leo Egghe,et al.  An h-index weighted by citation impact , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[29]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  New developments related to the Hirsch index , 2006 .

[30]  J. Hirsch Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.